2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of social environment on alternative mating tactics in male Endler's guppy, Poecilia wingei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only general male interest and gonopodial swings were repeatable. Sigmoid displays, sneaking attempts and gonopore nipping were not repeatable at all (Table c) because males responded to the change in their social environment (see Řežucha & Reichard ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Only general male interest and gonopodial swings were repeatable. Sigmoid displays, sneaking attempts and gonopore nipping were not repeatable at all (Table c) because males responded to the change in their social environment (see Řežucha & Reichard ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Light was provided by a 25‐W Sun Glo daylight spectrum bulb positioned above the aquarium. Females used in the experiment were collected from a virgin female aquarium and left with a group of 3 adult non‐experimental males from the stock aquarium for 1 d prior to the experimental trials to standardize their receptivity (Řežucha & Reichard ). During Courtship 2 trials (after exposure to social environment treatments), focal males were isolated from all conspecifics for 1.5 d prior to testing to standardize their mating effort.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Humfeld, 2013;Reichard, Smith, & Jordan, 2004;Rezucha & Reichard, 2014;Sato et al, 2004;Schradin & Lindholm, 2011), but may be especially relevant when morphological phenotypes in adults are fixed, as in most arthropods. Implications of our findings extend to female-biased SSD, as we show that the physical predominance seen in large males does not reflect general directional selection in favour of large size; yet context-and frequencydependent benefits of large size still persist.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The most remarkable example is satellite behaviour, in which parasitic males do not perform courtship by themselves but instead intercept females courted by other males (e.g. guppy [10][11][12] and frog [13]). In this example, parasitic males exploit the investment by other males [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%