The effect of some office papers quality characteristics on offset printing process

Elmas, Gülnur Mertoğlu; Karabulut, Beyza; Sönmez, Sinan

doi:10.1515/npprj-2022-0002

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Physical properties of papers according to print quality; effects of offset, laser and inkjet printing systems on color properties; recycling repetition effect on deinkability efficiency and printing properties; color values of Inkjet and Laserjet prints on recycled papers; color properties of papers subjected to different recycling numbers; effect of using recycled paper on the color difference in the inkjet printing system; efficiency of operators on print quality in offset printing; and weighting pressure's effect on dot gain (Yılmaz, 2016;Yılmaz et al, 2021aYılmaz et al, , 2021bYılmaz et al, , 2021cYılmaz, 2022;Yılmaz et al, 2022aYılmaz et al, , 2022bS ahin, 2012;S ahin et al, 2013;Elmas et al, 2022;Sönmez et al, 2022).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of papers according to offset print quality: the intuitionistic fuzzy based multi criteria decision making mechanism

Tuğrul

2022

PRT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The aim of this paper, using the intuitionistic fuzzy (IF)–set based Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE) method, is to create multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) mechanism that evaluates the papers according to the offset print quality, separately for each of the CMYK colors. Thanks to the mechanism, the most suitable and the most unsuitable paper for printing is determined. Design/methodology/approach With the IF PROMETHEE method, respectively, deviations are calculated by linear criteria type; the overall IF preference relation matrix is obtained. Finally, the positive and negative outranking flows are calculated; by obtaining net outranking flows, all papers are ranked from best to worst for printability. Findings Based on the results of the MCDM algorithm; the best offset printing quality is Matte Coated 115 gr. for cyan, magenta and black and Glossy Coated 115 gr. for yellow. The worst offset printing quality for all papers is 70 gr. III. low grade paper. According to the findings, when all colors are examined, the best paper for offset printing quality is coated papers; the worst paper is III. low grade papers. Originality/value The creation of mechanism that evaluates all criteria together leads to the most accurate result. Cases of hesitation are also addressed using an IF-based algorithm; all criteria were assigned individual importance levels, and a single result was obtained by activating all of the criteria simultaneously. Therefore reasons, this is paper that will bring innovation and shed light on studies in this field.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of papers according to offset print quality: the intuitionistic fuzzy based multi criteria decision making mechanism

Tuğrul

2022

PRT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Application of Expanded Perlite in the Composition of Paper for Writing and Printing

Andriievska,

Hlushkova,

Komakha

et al. 2024

Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digital printing systems and office papers interactions and the effects on print quality

Sönmez

Kurt

Elmas

et al. 2022

Nordic Pulp &Amp; Paper Research Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, electrophotographic printing and inkjet printing systems were applied to some commercial A4 office papers and their effects on print quality were determined. It is to evaluate the print quality by determining the test parameters that measure the print quality by applying electrophotographic printing and inkjet printing systems to some commercial office papers that have determined the surface properties and optical properties supplied from the market. Print quality was measured by testing with parameters such as delta gloss 60°, print lightness, print chroma, print density. As a result of the tests determined for print quality; print density values were low in A4 office papers with high roughness and porosity values, and the specular gloss values of the samples decreased in both printing applications. In electrophotographic printing; it was determined that darker colors formed with print lightness parameter, and the color scale increases in two-sided printing with print chroma values. It was determined that the color scale of print chroma values increased in two-sided prints. It was determined that mostly some commercial office papers were positively affected by printing on one side in inkjet printing and by printing on two-sided in electrophotographic printing.

show abstract

The effect of some office papers quality characteristics on offset printing process

Cited by 3 publications

References 15 publications

Evaluation of papers according to offset print quality: the intuitionistic fuzzy based multi criteria decision making mechanism

Evaluation of papers according to offset print quality: the intuitionistic fuzzy based multi criteria decision making mechanism

Application of Expanded Perlite in the Composition of Paper for Writing and Printing

Digital printing systems and office papers interactions and the effects on print quality

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About