The effect of SOX on audit quality

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to investigate two issues. First, the authors test the effect of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act (SOX) on audit quality after 10 years. Second, the authors test whether it was necessary to close all of the Arthur Andersen offices due to the misbehavior of a few (e.g. the Houston and Atlanta offices). Design/methodology/approach The authors have used conservatism (Basu) as a proxy for audit quality. Findings The authors find that, over the long run (10 years) after SOX adoption, there is a significant positive change in conservatism as compared to during the previous similar period. In addition, the authors find that only 6 of the 20 city-level offices of Arthur Andersen were less conservative than were their other Big 6 competitors in the same city. Furthermore, the results also suggest that some city-level offices of Arthur Andersen were engaged in more conservative accounting practices than were their competitors and the Houston Andersen offices. Originality/value This study documents, using empirical evidence, that the implementation of SOX is successful, and that one factor that helped lead to this success might be the harsh punishment on Arthur Andersen.

On the Political Decision of Audit Market Regulation: Empirical Evidence of Audit Firm Tenure and Maximum Durations within the European Union

“…Consequently, there is no indication of an optimal audit tenure. It must be mentioned that prior literature concerning the influence of the duration of an audit relationship or the effect of market interventions by the legislator on audit's quality are mainly available in international jurisdictions outside the EU (see, e.g., Ghosh and Moon 2005;Knechel and Vanstraelen 2007;Boone et al 2008;Chen et al 2008;Lim and Tan 2010;Baatwah 2016;Kim et al 2019). Nevertheless, it would be surprising to find different results in the EU.…”

Bridging the Gap: Integrating Forensic Accounting Skillsets for Enhanced Audit Quality in the Post-Pandemic Era

“…The United States' 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act stands out as the most well-known among such legislative measures. Predictably, the SOX Act has influenced the conduct of audits and heightened auditors' accountability to mitigate litigation risks (Duguay, Minnis, & Sutherland, 2020;Kim, Dandu, & Iren, 2019). Moreover, research has explored audits, fraud, and concerns related to financial statement reporting from various viewpoints.…”

Kualitas Audit dan Manajemen Laba Berbasis Operasional

“…Secara umum, perkembangan terbaru dalam konstelasi pengauditan, ukuran kantor auditor diklasifikasikan ke dalam kelompok 4 besar dan kelompok non-4 besar. Namun demikian perlu dicatat bahwa pengelompokan tersebut bersifat dinamis karena konstelasi kantor auditor dapat berubah sebagai akibat, antara lain, merger (Choi, Kim & Raman, 2017;Gong, Li, Lin & Wu, 2016) dan penutupan kantor oleh otoritas (Eckhaus & Sheaffer, 2018;Kim, Dandu & Iren, 2019). Sebagai konsekuensi, secara teknis, riset auditing terkadang memilih untuk menggunakan notasi Big-N sebagai upaya untuk merepresentasikan auditor yang berada dalam kelompok ukuran besar (Jung & Kim, 2019).…”