2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1044-5803(02)00361-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of specimen roughness and indenter tip geometry on the determination accuracy of thin hard coatings stress–strain laws by nanoindentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
58
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the behavior of indenter has also been investigated. The indenters were mainly simulated as perfectly rigid bodies to eliminate the nonlinear deformation during the indentation test [26,27], while [28] corrected a possible elastic deformation of the indenter by a system reduced modulus computed from the Young's modulus and the Poisson's ratio of both the indenter and the specimen. Machine compliance can easily be influenced by tilting or deforming the specimen [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the behavior of indenter has also been investigated. The indenters were mainly simulated as perfectly rigid bodies to eliminate the nonlinear deformation during the indentation test [26,27], while [28] corrected a possible elastic deformation of the indenter by a system reduced modulus computed from the Young's modulus and the Poisson's ratio of both the indenter and the specimen. Machine compliance can easily be influenced by tilting or deforming the specimen [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] These geometrical deviations seriously affect the values of hardness when measurements are conducted at penetration depths with magnitude similar to the indenter radius. [4][5][6] In these cases, the changes in the shape of the loading curve can also be confused with those caused by the material work hardening, 7 which leads to errors in the calculation of the work-hardening coefficient. Furthermore, significant changes on the correction factor b, used to adjust Sneddon's equations, [8][9][10][11][12] have been recently observed due to indenter tip roundness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental artifacts such as pile-up, substrate effects, anisotropy, and delamination and/or microcracking can lead to errors in the interpretation of force-displacement curves measured during nanoindentation [38][39][40][41][61][62][63] . As detailed in 60 , pile-up was empirically evaluated and corrected using the in-situ scan images.…”
Section: Asymmetric Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%