2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of speech distortion on the excitability of articulatory motor cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
60
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
7
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Correlational analyses were then performed to evaluate the relationship between hearing abilities (measured as PTA) and the excitability of the lip motor cortex. In one study (Nuttall et al, 2016), there was a greater motor facilitation when listening to the challenging condition than to clear speech for individuals with less sensitive hearing, while there was an opposite finding in the other study . The authors suggested that the type of perturbation affected the direction of the correlation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Correlational analyses were then performed to evaluate the relationship between hearing abilities (measured as PTA) and the excitability of the lip motor cortex. In one study (Nuttall et al, 2016), there was a greater motor facilitation when listening to the challenging condition than to clear speech for individuals with less sensitive hearing, while there was an opposite finding in the other study . The authors suggested that the type of perturbation affected the direction of the correlation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…We found a significant correlation between hearing sensitivities and facilitation of the tongue motor cortex during speech perception in older adults, but not in young adults. Two previous TMS studies in young adults with normal hearing found a relationship between hearing abilities and facilitation of the articulatory motor cortex during speech perception (Nuttall et al, 2016. In these studies, young adults received single-pulse TMS to elicit lip MEPs while they listened to clear speech or speech in challenging conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is equally remarkable that humans are able to swiftly and flexibly take advantage of diverse cues and resources in order to deal with the perceptual task at hand (Erb et al, 2013; Brown and Kuperberg, 2015). Listeners have been argued to draw on their knowledge about how speech is produced in order to help decode speech under difficult listening conditions (Nuttall et al, 2016) and as a tool to predict how upcoming speech will sound (Brunellière et al, 2009; Tian and Poeppel, 2010, 2013). What this exploratory study has suggested is that this knowledge is not static, but is updated and modulated by our ongoing sensorimotor experiences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MEPs tend to consist of multiple peaks, in contrast with hand MEPs, which tend to consist of two successive midline deflections (peak and trough) (Adank et al, 2016). It is not straightforward to measure p-p amplitudes when successive peaks are present, and the amplitude of lip MEPs can be underestimated if p-p is used as successive peaks in an OO MEP complex would be excluded from the final amplitude measurement.…”
Section: Effects Of Coil Orientation 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OO muscle is relevant to both clinical research, e.g., in Bell's Palsy (Schriefer et al, 1988, Meyer et al, 1994, and cognitive neuroscience studies where OO MEPs have been recorded to investigate changes in motor cortex activity during speech perception (Fadiga et al, 2002, Roy et al, 2008, Murakami et al, 2011, Swaminathan et al, 2013, Nuttall et al, 2016, Nuttall et al, 2017. These studies induced a PA current flow by adopting the standard 45 o downward pointing orientation recommended for hand MEP acquisition, despite the fact it has not been explicitly verified that the 45 o orientation used for hand MEPs is also suitable for OO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%