The Effect of Spinal versus General Anesthesia on Quality of Life in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request

Abstract

IntroductionThe proportion of women electing for cesarean delivery has increased in both developed and developing countries. Cesarean delivery on maternal request (CDMR) refers to a primary cesarean delivery performed because the mother requests this method of delivery in the absence of standard medical/obstetrical indications.Several studies compared anesthesia modalities in cesarean section regarding clinical outcomes such as maternal mortality, post-operative pain and bleeding, but only a few compared health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of women undergoing general anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia. The aim of this study was to determine whether pregnant women who undergo general anesthesia (GA) for cesarean delivery compared with spinal anesthesia (SA) differ regarding their perceived HRQoL.MethodologyWe enrolled 160 pregnant women with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class II, scheduled for CDMR with GA or SA. Anesthesia modality was based on patient’s preference. Participants assessed their state of health with the EuroQoL-5 Dimensions-3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) self-administered questionnaire at four time points: six hours before cesarean delivery, 24 hours after cesarean delivery, one week and one month after cesarean delivery. Patients also rated their health on the EQ visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) from 100 mm “best imaginable health state” to 0 mm “worst imaginable health state”.ResultsMore women who underwent spinal anesthesia reported “no problem” with regards to “mobility’ (64% vs. 30%, p = 0.00), “usual activities” (90% vs. 38%, p = 0.00), and “pain/discomfort” (20% vs. 5%, p = 0.007). Repeated measurement analysis showed that the two groups started off with the same EQ-VAS score, however, both decreased over time with different slope resulting in different scores at 24 hours after CS. Then the scores increased in both groups over time and ended up being rather close at one month after CS.DiscussionUnless there is a contraindication, neuraxial anesthesia is the anesthetic technique of choice for cesarean delivery in all parturient in general. This concept is based on more mortality and morbidity that have been seen with general anesthesia in this particular population. Our study demonstrated significant advantages of spinal anesthesia compared to general anesthesia in cesarean section regarding postoperatively perceived HRQoL. We showed that more pregnant women who chose spinal anesthesia as their anesthesia modality reported “no problem” with respect to “mobility” and “Self-care” 24 hours after cesarean section. On the top of that, more women in this group had “no problem” in their “usual activities” at one week and one month after cesarean delivery time points. Moreover, EQ-5D general health score was higher 24 hours after cesarean delivery with regional anesthesia comparing to general anesthesia.ConclusionWe determined that compared to general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia is the technique of choice for cesarean section because not only it avoids a general anesthetic and the risk of failed...

Incidence and Causes of Failed Spinal Anesthesia

“…Service quality, performance measurements, and patient safety are increasingly prominent and continuous measurements. For this reason, SA success rates should be assessed regularly, and attempts should be made to improve the quality of the procedure [7].…”

Changes in parameters of hemodynamics in abdominal delivery with different methods of anesthesia

“…Кесарів розтин (КР) є незамінною операцією, що сприяє зниженню материнської, перинатальної дитячої захворюваності та смертності [1]. В даний час основними способами знеболювання при кесаревому розтині є регіонарні методи (епідуральна, спінальна, комбінована спінальної-епідуральна анестезія), рідше -загальна анестезія (ЗА) з штучною вентиляцією легенів [2,3]. В акушерстві жоден з наявних в арсеналі анестезіолога методів анестезії не є ідеальним.…”

Comparison of efficacy and safety of preemptive infusion protocols of ephedrine and phenylephrine - prevention of hypotension and effects on hemodynamic parameters during spinal anesthesia for caesarean section

“…Due to the significantly higher percentage of morbidity and mortality under general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia (SA) is now the method of choice [1]. Cesarean section under SA leads to significant changes in hemodynamic parameters, such as preload, stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), heart rate (HR) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) [2].…”