1971
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.1971.21.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Staking and Pruning on the Yield and Quality of Fresh Market Tomatoes in East Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both seasons, total and marketable fruit number and marketable fruit weight did not differ between staked and unstaked plots, in agreement with Tewari and Vishunavat (2012). In contrast, earlier studies (Huxley, 1962;Wurster and Nganga, 1970), found that staking reduced tomato yields, whereas a later study (Karungi et al, 2011) indicated that the staking increased yields. In our study, the purchase of materials and labor associated with staking reduced gross margin without the benefit of increased marketable fruit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In both seasons, total and marketable fruit number and marketable fruit weight did not differ between staked and unstaked plots, in agreement with Tewari and Vishunavat (2012). In contrast, earlier studies (Huxley, 1962;Wurster and Nganga, 1970), found that staking reduced tomato yields, whereas a later study (Karungi et al, 2011) indicated that the staking increased yields. In our study, the purchase of materials and labor associated with staking reduced gross margin without the benefit of increased marketable fruit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%