1994
DOI: 10.1016/0377-8401(94)90052-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of starch supplementation of straw on microbial protein supply in sheep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiency of MNS in the present study, ranging between 20.13 g kg −1 DOMI and 23.38 g kg −1 DOMI among treatments, was higher compared to the MNS efficiencies observed by Gomes et al (1994). These higher MNS efficiencies could be indicative that energy supplementation of the wethers among all treatments was sufficient for optimal MNS production.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The efficiency of MNS in the present study, ranging between 20.13 g kg −1 DOMI and 23.38 g kg −1 DOMI among treatments, was higher compared to the MNS efficiencies observed by Gomes et al (1994). These higher MNS efficiencies could be indicative that energy supplementation of the wethers among all treatments was sufficient for optimal MNS production.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…While the starch supplemented in this treatment only supplied 60 % of the supplemental ME (with the SFM supplying the remainder), the starch levels were significantly less than the maximum levels supplied by Gomes et al (1994). The possibility therefore does exist that the amount of starch (and total energy intake of the supplements) in the experimental diets of the present study could have been insufficient for maximising MNS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Blummel et al (1999) recommended that roughage with higher PF has been shown to have higher DMI. It might be due to the increased passage of microbial protein to the small intestine which result the increased passage of both fluids and solids with increased intake (Gomes et al, 1994;Djouvinov and Todorov, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%