1992
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.82.1.94
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of state cigarette tax increases on cigarette sales, 1955 to 1988.

Abstract: We evaluated the effect of state cigarette tax increases on cigarette sales in the 50 states for the years 1955 to 1988. State cigarette tax increases were associated with an average decline in cigarette consumption of three cigarette packs per capita (about 2.4%). Larger tax increases were associated with larger declines in consumption. Raising state cigarette taxes appears to be an effective public health intervention that can reduce cigarette consumption and its associated health consequences.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
28
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These associations are consistent with previous studies showing the positive contribution of tobacco taxes and clean-air bylaws to tobacco control1 3 6 7 11 12 16-18 20 21 and the greater price sensitivity of men than women 3. Although there is much less literature on the sex specific effects of smoking restrictions, our finding that women's smoking is more strongly associated than men's with the existence of clean air laws is consistent with results from the Massachusetts Tobacco Survey3 but inconsistent with an earlier study by Chaloupka 34.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These associations are consistent with previous studies showing the positive contribution of tobacco taxes and clean-air bylaws to tobacco control1 3 6 7 11 12 16-18 20 21 and the greater price sensitivity of men than women 3. Although there is much less literature on the sex specific effects of smoking restrictions, our finding that women's smoking is more strongly associated than men's with the existence of clean air laws is consistent with results from the Massachusetts Tobacco Survey3 but inconsistent with an earlier study by Chaloupka 34.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…3 It is not surprising that 10-year price increases had no effect on smoking prevalence in our analysis, since smokers presumably adjust to higher prices over such a long time. It is more surprising that 1-year price increases, which varied from $7.10 to $14.43 (Canadian dollars) in 1991, depending on province of residence, were not significantly related to prevalence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…First, some previous studies (e.g., Meier and Licari, 1997) have used cross-sectional designs to compare tobacco consumption rates across jurisdictions, while others have used longitudinal data, comparing rates of consumer demand for tobacco products within a given political jurisdiction before and after a tax increase (e.g., Hu et al, 1995;Peterson et al, 1992;Sung et al, 2005). Both these designs remain ''non-interpretable'' (Shadish et al, 2002), especially as some of these data were obtained in populations in which the demand for tobacco is already declining (Flewelling et al, 1992), thereby rendering any conclusions about the effects of tax or price increases tentative at best.…”
Section: Implications and Advances Of The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%