2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10508-020-01867-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of State-Level Sex Education Policies on Youth Sexual Behaviors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Limited educational resources cannot meet the practical needs of young people, such as instruction in the prevention of sexually transmitted infections and pregnancy, how to use condoms, and consent issues ( 33 ). As evidenced by a sharp increase in the sexual activity of younger generations ( 32 ), traditional abstinence education no longer meets contemporary needs ( 34 36 ). In addition, 64.98% of students had received HIV/AIDS prevention and publicity services in school in the past year, 85.60% thought they needed HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment knowledge, and 94.60% thought it was necessary to increase HIV/AIDS prevention and health education activities; these findings suggest that there is still a lack of HIV/AIDS knowledge and publicity education in schools.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limited educational resources cannot meet the practical needs of young people, such as instruction in the prevention of sexually transmitted infections and pregnancy, how to use condoms, and consent issues ( 33 ). As evidenced by a sharp increase in the sexual activity of younger generations ( 32 ), traditional abstinence education no longer meets contemporary needs ( 34 36 ). In addition, 64.98% of students had received HIV/AIDS prevention and publicity services in school in the past year, 85.60% thought they needed HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment knowledge, and 94.60% thought it was necessary to increase HIV/AIDS prevention and health education activities; these findings suggest that there is still a lack of HIV/AIDS knowledge and publicity education in schools.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 14 , 15 While sexual health education is not mandated in Alabama public schools, those that do offer this curriculum are required to emphasize abstinence as the “expected social standard” for unmarried people, 16 despite studies indicating an association between abstinence-only education and higher rates of sexual activity among youth. 17 , 18 The state continues to interfere in the sexuality and gender of youth, including passing AL SB184 in April 2022, which criminalizes the prescription or administration of gender-affirming medications and procedures for the treatment of gender dysphoria in youth under the age of 19. 19 This example of intervention stigma, which affects providers and clients who engage in a medical treatment that is deemed socially unacceptable, 20 highlights the stigmatization of sexual health in Alabama.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Policy has also played a part in what adolescents are learning through sex education programs, and there are meaningful differences between abstinence‐only and comprehensive sex education. Atkins and Bradford (2021) examined how abstinence‐only education led to more sexual behavior and less contraceptive use (e.g., condoms and birth control), whereas comprehensive sex education was correlated with higher levels of adolescent abstinence and contraceptive use among sexually active youth. The use of these programs differs across the United States, with more school districts opting for abstinence‐only education or no sex education at all (Guttmacher Institute, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%