1982
DOI: 10.21236/ada113754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Stimulus-Central Processing-Response Compatibility and Resource Competition on Pilot Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It appeared idiosyncratic that having optimized the display of information, manual input procedures, navigation and training, operators were still exhibiting a greater than expected preference for audio mode. This contrasts with results reported by [13], and [18],wherein spatial tasks were determined as best satisfied by visual input and manual responses. Also, [9] reports that subjects tend to use speech to indicate a shift in content or functionality.…”
Section: Observations and Conclusioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…It appeared idiosyncratic that having optimized the display of information, manual input procedures, navigation and training, operators were still exhibiting a greater than expected preference for audio mode. This contrasts with results reported by [13], and [18],wherein spatial tasks were determined as best satisfied by visual input and manual responses. Also, [9] reports that subjects tend to use speech to indicate a shift in content or functionality.…”
Section: Observations and Conclusioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…In this experiment, as in the previous one, the dual-task decrement was very large. Most other dual-task studies have used simpler paradigms and obtained smaller decrements, although there are a number of studies that have obtained decrements as large, or almost as large, as we have (e.g., Brickner & Gopher, 1981, Experiment 2;Britton & Price, 1981;Duncan, 1979, Experiment 2;Kalsbeek & Sykes, 1967;Sandry & Wickens, 1982;Smith, 1969). The large decrement might be partly due to a tendency to process some components of the tasks sequentially, and one might suspect that outcome conflict is manifested only in such cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 50%
“…After reaching a criterion level of performance, each subject performed all 26 conditions six times each. For more detail about this experiment, refer to Sandry and Wickens (1982).…”
Section: Experiments 2: S-c-r Compatibility In An F-18 Simulatormentioning
confidence: 99%