INTRODUCTIONThe number of studies of hydrogen related fracture in recent years is quite impressive both in the variety of systems studied and in the amount of materials characterization which has been obtained 1-3. Despite this effort there is still incomplete understanding of the mechanisms by which the hydrogen related failures occur and hence each material becomes a new and novel problem. The advantage of obtaining an adequate understanding of the failure mechanisms is that general rules of behavior can then guide the selection and application of new materials in aggressive environments.In focussing on the understanding of the basic mechanisms of environmental!y related fracture it is important to distinguish between those experiments and effects which are dependent on the kinetics of fracture and those which are mechanistically related. Kinetic studies can be applied to develop an understanding of the factors which determine the failure rates but should not be used to classify materials with respect to the mechanisms of failure. Thus materials which had been classified as insensitive to hydrogen effects , e.g. Al 4, stainless steels 5,6, etc. have recently been shown to be highly susceptible to "hydrogen embrittlement" when exposed to a sufficiently high fugacity of hydrogen or tested at sufficiently low strain rates and the proper temperature range.There has been no shortage of suggested mechanisms 1,2,7; but few have stood the test of critical examination; particularly as new experimental and theoretical methods become available. At the present time several viable mechanisms remain, each of which can be supported by some experimental and theoretical evidence. The preponderance of evidence is that there are several hydrogen related failure mechanisms rather than a single dominant mechanism and that even within one material system several of these may be operative. In cases where this is true, the particular mechanism which leads to failure is controlled by kinetics. An example of this will be discussed subsequently. In the present paper three mechanisms will be discussed; embrittlement due to hydrogen related phase changes, hydrogen enhanced plasticity related fracture and the decohesion mechanisms.
HYDROGEN RELATED PHASE CHANGE MECHANISMSA number of metallic systems have demonstrated hydrogen embrittlement due to stress induced formation of hydrides or other relatively brittle phases and the subsequent brittle fracture of these phases 8- 13 Several types of phases may take part in this failure mechanism; e.g. hydrides, martensitic phases 14-17, etc. The basic requirements are that these phases be stabilipd by the presence of hydrogen and the crack tip stress field 10,16,18 and that the phase which forms be brittle 19,20. The 2 typical system which exhibits failure by this mechanism forms stable hydrides in the absence of stress and these hydrides, by virtue of their large AVformation, are thermodynamically more stable under the stress and hydride fugacity conditions at the crack tip 18. In some cases hydr...