1959
DOI: 10.1177/000306515900700102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Subliminal Visual Stimulation on Images and Dreams: A Validation Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…state in order to demonstrate "subliminal" perception, (e.g., Fisher & Paul, 1959;Fiss, Goldberg & Klein, 1963; see also Dixon, 1971). …”
Section: Nonintentional Conscious Experiencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…state in order to demonstrate "subliminal" perception, (e.g., Fisher & Paul, 1959;Fiss, Goldberg & Klein, 1963; see also Dixon, 1971). …”
Section: Nonintentional Conscious Experiencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To try to eliminate one of these "contaminants," we created a "Control Recovery score" by subtracting the number of items in our scoring key appearing in those images elicited after the blank card. [This same method has been used in other studies, including the ones by Fisher and Paul ( 1959; . ]…”
Section: Looking Time and The Con Ten^ Of Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fantasy productions. Fantasy productions are of vanous kmds, such as stones to TAT cards (Pme, 1960), or drawmgs of pnmed or unpnmed images Pruned images are those that are suggested when the subject has done somethmg else, such as respondmg m a word-association test, or been given some kmd of kmt, perhaps through a word list, unpnmed unages result when he IS free to fantasy anythmg and to try to draw what appears The drawmgs of fantasied pictures under these two circumstances have been widely used to detect activation by unnoticed features of a stimulus, eg, Allers and Teler (1924), Fisher (1956), Hilgard (1958, Paul (1959), andPaul andFisher (1959) Most mvestigators report positive results, but the results have to be mterpreted with some caution A useful review, sensitive to the issues mvolved, is that of Fisher (1960b) 4 Dreams Dreams are special kmds of fantasy productions The early expenments of Poetzl (1917) showed recovery of unnoticed features of visually presented stimuh in dreams, and his lead has been followed by others, notably Malamud and Lmder (1931), Fisher (1954, 1956, 1960a, and Shevnn and Luborsky (1958) The results are, in general, similar to those found in waking fantasy. Careful exammation by Johnson & Enksen (1961) of the results of Shevnn and Luborsky casts some doubt upon the statistical significance of their findmgs, because theirs IS the only senes m repetition of Poetzl that has thus far attempted statistical control, it leaves the whole matter a httle uncertam from a quantitative scientific standpomt.…”
Section: How Activation From Unidentified Stimulus Pattems May Be Manmentioning
confidence: 99%