2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.01.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) as an electrode binder for direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One approach is to use a catalyst binder with the same composition as the PEM [109,175,176]. This method was effective in improving compatibility with the PEM.…”
Section: Surface Fluorinated Pemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach is to use a catalyst binder with the same composition as the PEM [109,175,176]. This method was effective in improving compatibility with the PEM.…”
Section: Surface Fluorinated Pemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[52][53][54] Thus the development of new proton conducting polymers for membranes ought to be complemented by the development of similar polymers for use in catalyst layers-but the latter has considerably lagged the former. Perhaps this is because of a perception that having developed an alternative hydrocarbon proton conducting polymer it would be a simple matter to incorporate it in the catalyst layers to prepare MEAsas is conventionally carried out with PFSAs.…”
Section: Alternative Proton Conducting Polymers For Use In Catalyst Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even under similar reaction conditions the degree of sulfonation of polyaromatic polymers can vary widely between synthetic batches. Sulfonated polyetheretherketone (sPEEK) 53 and sulfonated polyarylsulfones (sPAES) 52 have been incorporated in catalyst layers and examined in methanol fuel cells, and while the beginning-of-life performances of sPEEK 53 or sPAES 52 -based MEAs were lower than MEAs prepared with polyaromatic membrane and NafionÒ-based catalyst layer, the interfacial resistance of the catalyst layer/membrane interface remained constant during operation, whereas that of the NafionÒ/polyaromatic-MEA increased significantly. The lack of compatibility between the polyaromatic electrolytes and perfluorosulfonic leads rapidly to delamination of the CL from the membrane and a decrease in fuel performance.…”
Section: Durabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[83] Jung et al investigated the durability of PEMFCs with SAP-based membranes and SAP-based electrode binders. [84,85] It was claimed that SAP electrode binders (for example, sulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone) and SPEEK) were more efficient than conventional Nafion binders at maintaining the long-term stability of the DMFC. However, the control of swelling of the SAP-based binder, while maintaining high proton conductivity, is still pivotal for membraneelectrode compatibility.…”
Section: Durability Test Of Sap-based Electrode Bindersmentioning
confidence: 99%