2022
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6ac9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Supernova Convection On Neutron Star and Black Hole Masses

Abstract: Our understanding of the convective-engine paradigm driving core-collapse supernovae has been used for two decades to predict the remnant mass distribution from stellar collapse. These predictions improve as our understanding of this engine increases. In this paper, we review our current understanding of convection (in particular, the growth rate of convection) in stellar collapse and study its effect on the remnant mass distribution. We show how the depth of the mass gap between neutron stars and black holes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This gives an upper limit in the initial BH mass function of about 50M . However, there are several uncertainties in the modelling, and different assumptions can lead to significantly different values for the high mass cut-off, generally in the range 40M to 70M (Giacobbo et al 2018;Farmer et al 2020;Costa et al 2021;Fryer et al 2022). Exploring the effect of these uncertainties is beyond the scope of this paper, but should be considered in future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This gives an upper limit in the initial BH mass function of about 50M . However, there are several uncertainties in the modelling, and different assumptions can lead to significantly different values for the high mass cut-off, generally in the range 40M to 70M (Giacobbo et al 2018;Farmer et al 2020;Costa et al 2021;Fryer et al 2022). Exploring the effect of these uncertainties is beyond the scope of this paper, but should be considered in future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "lower edge" of the lower mass gap is set by the maximum possible neutron star mass, while the "upper edge" is set by the minimum observed BH mass. The upper edge of the lower mass gap, if it exists, is currently uncertain, as the BHs found in this mass range may have been created by changes in the growth time of convection during an SN explosion (Fryer et al 2022) or by binary neutron star mergers (Thompson et al 2019;Abbott et al 2020;Gupta et al 2020;Yang et al 2020;Ye & Fishbach 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of uncertain factors make a straightforward determination challenging. For example, current estimates of the BH initial mass function from single stars chiefly rely on parameterized explosion models (Fryer et al 2012;Spera et al 2015;Patton & Sukhbold 2020;Zapartas et al 2021;Fryer et al 2022;Patton et al 2022;Renzo et al 2022). Models for the evolution from the ZAMS also still rely on effective mixing length theories for convection, including ours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "lower edge" of the lower mass gap is set by the maximum possible neutron star mass while the "upper edge" is set by the minimum observed BH mass. The upper edge of the lower mass gap, if it exists, is currently uncertain as BHs found in this mass range may have been created by changes in the growth time of convection during a SN explosion (Fryer et al 2022), or by binary neutron star mergers (Thompson et al 2019;Abbott et al 2020;Gupta et al 2020;Yang et al 2020;Ye & Fishbach 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of uncertain factors make a straightforward determination challenging. For example, current estimates of the BH initial mass function from single stars chiefly rely on parameterized explosion models (Spera et al 2015;Patton & Sukhbold 2020;Zapartas et al 2021;Patton et al 2022;Fryer et al 2012Fryer et al , 2022Renzo et al 2022). Models for the evolution from the ZAMS also still rely on effective mixing length theories for convection, including ours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%