1990
DOI: 10.2307/3587129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Syntax, Speed, and Pauses on Listening Comprehension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
96
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is important to take into account how forms of redundancy with different complexity and salience affect comprehension across listeners of higher and lower proficiency (e.g., Chaudron, 1983). Lynch (1988; as cited in Rubin, 1994, p. 203) noted that the usefulness of redundant information may depend on its being recognized as a repetition of previously given information (see also Blau, 1990, andField, 2008); in lower-proficiency listeners, more complex types of redundancy may simply add to the processing load (Anderson & Lynch, 1988;Chaudron, 1983). In considering redundancy, it is also important to take into consideration its potential interaction with speech rate:…”
Section: Summary: Redundancymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, it is important to take into account how forms of redundancy with different complexity and salience affect comprehension across listeners of higher and lower proficiency (e.g., Chaudron, 1983). Lynch (1988; as cited in Rubin, 1994, p. 203) noted that the usefulness of redundant information may depend on its being recognized as a repetition of previously given information (see also Blau, 1990, andField, 2008); in lower-proficiency listeners, more complex types of redundancy may simply add to the processing load (Anderson & Lynch, 1988;Chaudron, 1983). In considering redundancy, it is also important to take into consideration its potential interaction with speech rate:…”
Section: Summary: Redundancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sentence structure Blau (1990) investigated whether simplifying syntax or including surface clues for more complex sentences would affect L2 listening comprehension and found no significant effect of these manipulations. These results imply that modifying sentence structure (in terms of simplifying syntax and including cues to underlying structure) of aural passages does not impact second language learners' listening comprehension.…”
Section: Syntactic Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Normal rate, which mirrors authentic, real world communication, is what is preferred. Based on her research, Eileen Blau 14 concludes that slowing down or simplifying syntax may not be very useful for second language learners. To enhance learner comprehension, it is more advisable to use longer pauses between semantic groups so that students can process the whole meaning and not spend too much time deciphering individual words or sentences.…”
Section: Instructor's Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly and specifically in the listening context, there may be a high degree of variation and nuance regarding the speed of speech, pronunciation and regional accents (Adank, Evans, Stuart-Smith & Scott, 2009). Blau (1990) further notes that comprehension of English language in the listening context is affected by syntax, speech rate, pauses and the rate of such pauses all affect listening comprehension overall. Listening is "a critical priority among the four skill areas for language student"" (Hamouda, 2013, p.113).…”
Section: Focusing On Enhancing Listening Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%