2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of target strength on the perforation of steel plates using three different projectile nose shapes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
166
5
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
18
166
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For ductile metals, within that range of stress states, the failure strain becomes rather independent of triaxiality as reported in [48], Fig. 23.…”
Section: Comparison Between Experiments and Numerical Simulationsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…For ductile metals, within that range of stress states, the failure strain becomes rather independent of triaxiality as reported in [48], Fig. 23.…”
Section: Comparison Between Experiments and Numerical Simulationsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…3. The solid lines in this figure are fits to the data of the Recht-Ipson model employed to predict the residual velocity V r [30,31],…”
Section: Validation Of the Jc Materials Model And Materials Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a substantial amount of studies con cerning the dynamic behaviour of Weldox 460 E can be found in the international literature, mainly dealing with its behaviour during impact (Borvik et al, 1999(Borvik et al, , 2002aDey et al, 2004). The behaviour of the material can be as sumed as isotropic (Børvik et al, 2001).…”
Section: Weldox 46 E Steelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical simulation of perforation by application of RK and JC models Impact perforation of steel plates was widely studied in the last decades due to the applications necessary in sev eral engineering fields like aeronautics, automotive or mil itary industries (Borvik et al, 1999;2002a,b;Gupta et al, 2006Gupta et al, , 2007Arias et al, 2008;Rusinek et al, 2008bRusinek et al, , 2008cTeng et al, in press;Piekutowski, 2001;Chocron et al, 2001;Forrestal and Piekutowski, 2000;Dey et al, 2004;Børvik et al, 2005;Chocron et al, 2006;Teng and Wierzbicki, 2006;Voyiadjis and Abu Al Rub, 2006;Rodríguez Martínez et al, 2008). Several works can be found in the international literature dealing with differ ent aspects of the perforation processes, for example, pro jectile geometry (Borvik et al, 2002a,b;Gupta et al, 2006Gupta et al, , 2007Arias et al, 2008;Rusinek et al, 2008b), target thick ness, (Borvik et al, 2003), constitutive relation (Rusinek et al, 2008c), failure criterion (Teng and Wierzbicki, 2006), or material optimization, (Dey et al, 2004).…”
Section: Comparison Between Rk Pb and Jc Constitutive Relations For mentioning
confidence: 99%