1992
DOI: 10.3758/bf03330382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of task interruption and closure on perceived duration

Abstract: On the basis of a version of the Zeigarnik (1927) demonstration, the effect of task interruption and closure on perceived duration was examined. Subjects estimated the time it took to solve a list of 10 three-letter anagrams; this group thus experienced closure when they completed the task. A second group of subjects was presented with a 20-item set of anagrams, the flrst 10 of which were identical to the items solved by the flrst group. These subjects were interrupted after solving the flrst 10 items, then th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In West et al's study, the prospective memory cue appeared in the same context in which it would have otherwise been performed (i.e., the semantic judgment task). Finally, participants in the present study performed the prospective memory task before being instructed that it was finished; participants in West et al's study never performed the prospective memory action to the cue that they were told to forget (see Zeigarnik tasks; Schiffman & Greist-Bousquet, 1992). Therefore, whether prospective memories are quickly deactivated may not only depend to the task interference approach, the present methodology is an informative means to study spontaneous retrieval.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In West et al's study, the prospective memory cue appeared in the same context in which it would have otherwise been performed (i.e., the semantic judgment task). Finally, participants in the present study performed the prospective memory task before being instructed that it was finished; participants in West et al's study never performed the prospective memory action to the cue that they were told to forget (see Zeigarnik tasks; Schiffman & Greist-Bousquet, 1992). Therefore, whether prospective memories are quickly deactivated may not only depend to the task interference approach, the present methodology is an informative means to study spontaneous retrieval.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lexical decision task occurred after performance of the prospective memory task (see the Zeigarnik task for comparison : Schiffman & Greist-Bousquet, 1992), thereby attenuating possible confusion for the participants about when the prospective memory task should be performed. By contrast, in the Einstein et al (2005, Experiment 5) paradigm, because the lexical decision task interrupted the image-rating task and occurred before prospective memory trials, it is possible that their participants were occasionally confused and monitored.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Task success is important to investigate in relation to measures of mental workload because users dynamically adjust their mental efforts to perform successfully and because task success-unlike, for example, time constraints-is associated with the end product of the task and therefore does not become apparent until at the end of the task. In addition, some studies suggest that time perception may be affected by task success (Czerwinski, Horwitz, & Cutrell, 2001;Schiffman & Greist-Bousquet, 1992). Finally, task success is important to all goal-directed behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shiffman and Greist-Bousquet (1992) conducted a study where participants estimated completion times of interrupted and uninterrupted tasks. They found that the interruption of a task had a "lengthening effect on perceived time duration" (Shiffman & Greist-Bousquet, 1992, p. 9), suggesting that attention overload results in perceptions of increased time on task performance.…”
Section: The Influence Of Interruptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%