2017
DOI: 10.13066/kspm.2017.12.3.79
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Task-oriented Training on Mobility Function, Postural Stability in Children with Cerebral Palsy

Abstract: | Abstract |1 )PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to examine how task-oriented training focused on lower extremity strengthening can affect mobility function and postural stability. METHODS:The study's subjects included 10 children with cerebral palsy: 7 girls and 3 boys between the ages of 4 and 9 whose Gross Motor Functional Classification System (GMFCS) level was I or II. Their functional mobility was gauged using the Gross Motor Function Measurement (GMFM), and their postural stability was evaluated usi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The task-oriented training resulted in the overall stability index improved by 40.77%, anteroposterior index improved by 36.97%, and mediolateral stability index improved by 27.93% in spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsied children. The findings are in agreement with other reports stating that taskoriented training is highly recommended for children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy who suffer from balance problems [21]. our results are also supported by research presenting a significant positive effect on balance among cerebral palsied children who conformed to a training program including functional mobility exercises, such as sit-tostand, step-up, and walking downstairs [29,30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The task-oriented training resulted in the overall stability index improved by 40.77%, anteroposterior index improved by 36.97%, and mediolateral stability index improved by 27.93% in spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsied children. The findings are in agreement with other reports stating that taskoriented training is highly recommended for children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy who suffer from balance problems [21]. our results are also supported by research presenting a significant positive effect on balance among cerebral palsied children who conformed to a training program including functional mobility exercises, such as sit-tostand, step-up, and walking downstairs [29,30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Some authors concluded that task-oriented training was effective in improving mobility and balance among spastic diplegic children [17][18][19]. others reported that task-oriented training was an effective and feasible strategy for improving the mobility function and postural stability of children with cerebral palsy [20,21]. despite these conclusions, relatively few studies have examined the effect of task-oriented training on improving balance in hemiplegic cerebral palsied children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings of the current study were in line with literature (21) , showing significant improvement in postural stability and functional mobility in CP children. The current study showed there was noteworthy difference between baseline and post-treatment values in both the groups (p=0.001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…it was similarly reported that ToET was used to improve mobility function [6] and balance [6,25] in children with CP. Furthermore, another study revealed that an 8-week task-oriented training that was focused on strengthening the lower extremities led to a significant improvement in the mobility function and postural stability of children with CP [41]. on the contrary, Crompton et al [29] found that group-based lower-limb ToET did not produce a significant improvement in the walking distance after the intervention or at follow-up, probably because the group-based training did not use a customized training load for each participant, hence the subjects may not have achieved the individualized training goals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%