2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0047-2727(01)00092-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of tax-based savings incentives on the self-employed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
20
2
Order By: Relevance
“…At the individual level, all but one specification returns a positive estimate ranging from 0.023 to 0.042, implying a semi‐elasticity from 0.15 to 0.26, which is of the same magnitude as previous studies (Collins & Wyckoff, ; Power & Rider, ). None of the estimates, however, is significant at the 10 per cent significance level.…”
Section: Regression Discontinuity Estimatessupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At the individual level, all but one specification returns a positive estimate ranging from 0.023 to 0.042, implying a semi‐elasticity from 0.15 to 0.26, which is of the same magnitude as previous studies (Collins & Wyckoff, ; Power & Rider, ). None of the estimates, however, is significant at the 10 per cent significance level.…”
Section: Regression Discontinuity Estimatessupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The first two columns report the treatment effect for the lower threshold. At the individual level, all linear specifications suggest that there is a small but insignificant increase in participation, which is equivalent to a semi‐elasticity of 0.09‐0.18, comparable to that of Power and Rider () and Collins and Wyckoff () . The estimates, however, are smaller when more flexible models are used.…”
Section: Regression Discontinuity Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The conclusion that firms, including the self‐employed, are quite responsive to health insurance tax incentives is echoed in studies of taxable income (Wu 2005) and the responsiveness of the self‐employed to tax incentives targeted at savings (Power and Rider 2002). The self‐employed are more likely to contribute to tax‐deferred retirement savings plans and contribute more as the after‐tax price declines.…”
Section: Previous Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, few have exploited administrative records to examine their saving behavior. A rare example is Power and Rider (2002) who examine panel data made up of the income tax returns of Schedule C filers (proprietors) and study the pattern of the combined contributions to Keogh and individual retirement accounts (IRAs), including contributions to benefit their employees (reported on Schedule C), in response to changes in tax regimes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%