The Effect of Telehealth on Hospital Services Use: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract

Background Telehealth interventions, that is, health care provided over a distance using information and communication technology, are suggested as a solution to rising health care costs by reducing hospital service use. However, the extent to which this is possible is unclear. Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of telehealth on the use of hospital services, that is, (duration of) hospitalizations, and to compare the effects between telehealth types and health conditions. Methods We searched PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from inception until April 2019. Peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the effect of telehealth interventions on hospital service use compared with usual care were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and quality of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines. Results We included 127 RCTs in the meta-analysis. Of these RCTs, 82.7% (105/127) had a low risk of bias or some concerns overall. High-quality evidence shows that telehealth reduces the risk of all-cause or condition-related hospitalization by 18 (95% CI 0-30) and 37 (95% CI 20-60) per 1000 patients, respectively. We found high-quality evidence that telehealth leads to reductions in the mean all-cause and condition-related hospitalizations, with 50 and 110 fewer hospitalizations per 1000 patients, respectively. Overall, the all-cause hospital days decreased by 1.07 (95% CI −1.76 to −0.39) days per patient. For hospitalized patients, the mean hospital stay for condition-related hospitalizations decreased by 0.89 (95% CI −1.42 to −0.36) days. The effects were similar between telehealth types and health conditions. A trend was observed for studies with longer follow-up periods yielding larger effects. Conclusions Small to moderate reductions in hospital service use can be achieved using telehealth. It should be noted that, despite the large number of included studies, uncertainties around the magnitude of effects remain, and not all effects are statistically significant.

Efficacy of Web-Based Supportive Interventions in Quality of Life in COPD Patients, a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

“…The most recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses [ 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ] on telehealth care analyze teleassessment, telephone assistance, mobile app development, and website assistance in depth, but they need to be analyzed separately [ 8 ].…”

Budget impact analysis of providing hospital inpatient care at home virtually, starting with two specific surgical patient groups

“…⇒ This study was conducted within the context of the Dutch healthcare system, which may limit the generalisability of the results. Open access such as heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is well studied and is generally positive, [11][12][13] these patient categories are at relatively low risk of complications requiring hospitalisation compared with postsurgery patients. Presently, hospitals in the Netherlands are increasingly investing in telehealth to substitute in-hospital care.…”

Telehealth care system for chronic disease management of middle-aged and older adults in remote areas

“…7 Not only can it effectively control and reduce the incidence of hospitalization, but it can also significantly delay readmission. [8][9][10] Previous research has established the benefits of telehealth care. A recent study using the Internet and a telehealth care system to strengthen interactions between the community, hospital staff, and family members through virtual video, telephone, and visitor management can effectively improve family members' satisfaction and reduce patient transfer costs and length of hospitalization.…”

“…7 Not only can it effectively control and reduce the incidence of hospitalization, but it can also significantly delay readmission. 8–10…”