2020
DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1778820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Temporal Frames in Anti-Smoking Messages on the Extension of Anti-Smoking Arguments to Smokers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, the article must examine at least one of the following persuasion outcome variables: risk perception, attitude, behavioral intention, and behavior. Two articles were excluded for not meeting this criterion ( n = 2) as they studied argument choice (S. J. Lee, 2020) and neural responses (Casado-Aranda et al, 2018) as the dependent variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third, the article must examine at least one of the following persuasion outcome variables: risk perception, attitude, behavioral intention, and behavior. Two articles were excluded for not meeting this criterion ( n = 2) as they studied argument choice (S. J. Lee, 2020) and neural responses (Casado-Aranda et al, 2018) as the dependent variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two articles were excluded for not meeting this criterion (n = 2) as they studied argument choice (S. J. Lee, 2020) and neural responses (Casado-Aranda et al, 2018) as the dependent variables. Finally, the article must contain sufficient statistical information for effect size computation.…”
Section: Selection Of Studies For Inclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%