2001
DOI: 10.1006/cpac.2000.0456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of the 150-hour requirement on new accountants’ professional commitment, Ethical orientation, and Professionalism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As indicated by the results of Clikeman et al . (), reliability scores of all five sub‐dimensions ranged from 49 to 60 percent, thus failing to reach the acceptable level of 70 percent recommended by Nunnally (). Accordingly, scale reliability of the professionalism instrument of Hall () and Snizek () seems to be low and tends to vary widely.…”
Section: Previous Professionalism Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As indicated by the results of Clikeman et al . (), reliability scores of all five sub‐dimensions ranged from 49 to 60 percent, thus failing to reach the acceptable level of 70 percent recommended by Nunnally (). Accordingly, scale reliability of the professionalism instrument of Hall () and Snizek () seems to be low and tends to vary widely.…”
Section: Previous Professionalism Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Hall () developed a 50‐item instrument with five sub‐scales to measure professionalism (Appendix I). This instrument was revised to 25 items by Snizek (), and many accounting management studies used the shortened instrument (Bartol, ; Norris and Neibuhr, ; Morrow and Goetz, ; Kalbers and Fogarty, ; Clikeman et al ., ).…”
Section: Previous Professionalism Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Italy is peculiar because, unlike other countries (Bottery, 1998; Empson et al , 2015; Hamilton, 2013; Samuel et al , 2009; Paisey and Paisey, 2000, 2006; Preston et al , 1995; Willmott, 1990) and despite specific technical skills and high-quality knowledge, the Italian accountancy profession is effectively a non-profession . This is mainly the result of its professional body’s failure to take action or advocate effectively for its members to retain their high social status (Greenwood et al , 2002; Willmott, 1986) or to ensure a monopoly of practice (Clikeman et al , 2001; Federation des Experts-Comptables Europeens, 2002; Financial Reporting Council, 2003; Johnson, 1972; Samuel et al , 2009; Walker, 1991). These findings confirm important differences between the Italian professional body and its UK and US counterparts, which have often attempted to renegotiate their boundaries (American Accounting Association Future Committee (The Bedford Committee), 1986; Albrecht and Sack, 2000; Kirkham and Loft, 1993; Samuel et al , 2009; Shackleton and Walker, 2001; Walker, 2004; Williams, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies on the accounting profession assert that protecting the profession’s technical and specialist knowledge and expertise is a fundamental challenge for both accountants and their professional bodies (Empson et al , 2015; Greenwood et al , 2002; Hamilton, 2013). The ability to control who becomes an accountant and to self-regulate (Clikeman et al , 2001; Federation des Experts-Comptables Europeens, 2002; Financial Reporting Council, 2003; Samuel et al , 2009) can lead to a monopoly of practice (Johnson, 1972). Members of the profession are therefore likely to perceive that they have a high social status (Walker, 1991).…”
Section: Identity and The Accounting Profession: Developing An Integrated Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several accounting studies have investigated how some personality traits of accountants interact with other variables within an ethics framework (Shaub et al 1993;Tsui and Gul 1996;Bernardi 1997;Hyatt and Prawitt 2001;Yetmar and Eastman 2000;Clikeman et al 2001;Douglas et al 2001;Pope 2005;Shafer 2008;Wakefield 2008;Shafer and Simmons 2008;Fathil and Schmidtke 2010;Hartmann and Maas 2010;Shafer and Wang 2011), most of these studies used subjects from the U.S. The results from the studies that did include culturally different subjects suggest that individuals' Machiavellianism and ethical orientation vary across cultures (Douglas and Wier 2005;Rawwas et al 2005;Robertson et al 2008;Vitell and Patwardhan 2008;Forsyth et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%