The Effect of the Diffusion of the Surgical Robot on the Hospital-level Utilization of Partial Nephrectomy

Abstract

Introduction The rapid diffusion of the surgical robot has been controversial because of the technology’s high costs and its disputed marginal benefit. Some, however, have suggested that adoption of the robot may have improved care for patients with renal malignancy by facilitating partial nephrectomy, an underutilized, technically challenging procedure believed to be less morbid than radical nephrectomy. We sought to determine whether institutional acquisition of the robot was associated with increased utilization of partial nephrectomy. Methods We used all payer data from 7 states to identify 21,569 nephrectomies. These patient-level records were aggregated to the hospital-level then merged with the American Hospital Association Annual Survey and publicly available data on timing of robot acquisition. We used a multivariable difference-in-difference model to assess at the hospital-level whether robot acquisition was associated with an increase in the proportion of partial nephrectomy, adjusting for hospital nephrectomy volume, year of surgery, and several additional hospital-level factors. Results In the multivariable-adjusted differences-in-differences model, hospitals acquiring a robot between 2001 and 2004 performed a greater proportion of partial nephrectomy in both 2005 (29.9% increase) and 2008 (34.9% increase). Hospitals acquiring a robot between 2005 and 2008 also demonstrated a greater proportion of partial nephrectomy in 2008 (15.5% increase). In addition, hospital nephrectomy volume and urban location were also significantly associated with increased proportion of partial nephrectomy. Conclusions Hospital acquisition of the surgical robot is associated with greater proportion of partial nephrectomy, an underutilized, guideline-encouraged procedure. This is one of the few studies to suggest robot acquisition is associated with improvement in quality of patient care.

Predicting complications in partial nephrectomy for T1a tumours: does approach matter?

“…The majority of patients underwent RAPN (76.3%, n = 545). Both approaches were similar with regard to age, gender, race, CCI, preoperative eGFR and clinical tumour size ( [5][6][7][8]; P < 0.001). Although the overall rate of intra-operative complications did not differ between groups (OPN 1.8% vs RAPN 1.7%; P = 1.0), patients in the open cohort were more likely to require intra-operative transfusions (3% vs 0.7%; P = 0.038).…”

“…Dissemination and availability of robotic technology has increased the utilization of NSS for the management of renal tumours by decreasing the learning curve, thus making the approach more accessible to community surgeons [4,5].…”

“…Use of the robotic platform continues to increase for management of renal tumours, and in turn, robotic adoption has increased the overall utilization of NSS [4,5]. While recent investigations have shown a lower risk of complications after minimally invasive surgery [6][7][8], large, comparative studies assessing surgical complications between open partial nephrectomy (OPN) and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) are sparse.…”

Variation in the Use of Open Pyeloplasty, Minimally Invasive Pyeloplasty, and Endopyelotomy for the Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Adults

“…19 At the same time, providers were becoming more comfortable performing robotic kidney surgery, which uses similar port placement and requires similar steps to expose the kidney and ureter. 20 The patients who received open and minimally invasive pyeloplasties had many similarities. They did not differ in terms of age, number of comorbidities, type of health plan, or area of residence (in terms of region and urbanicity).…”

Survival benefit of partial nephrectomy: Reconciling experimental and observational data

“…In synthesizing these data, we must also appreciate the evolving risk profile of partial vs. radical nephrectomy. The accumulation of experience, implementation of clinical pathways, and rise of the robotic platform have modernized surgical delivery, making partial nephrectomy less morbid (at least for recovery) and more accessible to the population at large [20,39,40]. Patients and providers also have alternative management strategies to consider, such as ablation and surveillance.…”