1978
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1097(78)90069-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of the growth environment on the serum sensitivity of some urinary Escherichia coli strains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that a possible component of cellular resistance may be due to a reversal of the inhibitory effects of the MAC (Dankert 1989). The same strain became sensitive to the bactericidal action of serum when grown in carbon-and magnesium-limited conditions (Taylor 1978;Taylor et al 1981). This sensitivity seemed to be related to a lower lipopolysaccharide O side chain sugar to core-sugar ratio, assessed after one hour of serum incubation (Taylor et al 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This indicates that a possible component of cellular resistance may be due to a reversal of the inhibitory effects of the MAC (Dankert 1989). The same strain became sensitive to the bactericidal action of serum when grown in carbon-and magnesium-limited conditions (Taylor 1978;Taylor et al 1981). This sensitivity seemed to be related to a lower lipopolysaccharide O side chain sugar to core-sugar ratio, assessed after one hour of serum incubation (Taylor et al 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This indicates that a possible component of cellular resistance may be due to a reversal of the inhibitory effects of the MAC (Dankert 1989). The same strain became sensitive to the bactericidal action of serum when grown in carbon‐ and magnesium‐limited conditions (Taylor 1978; Taylor et al . 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even so, the reduction in CFU was only in the order of one-half log viability of this organism. Earlier investigators have established that serum susceptibility of bacteria is influenced by the growth conditions employed for preparation of the inoculum (16). E. coli for instance are more readily killed by serum when in stationary phase (3,13).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response of bacteria grown in nutrient-limited culture to normal human serum is also shown in table I. Serum-sensitivity tests were performed on portions of bacterial suspension removed from the culture vessel during collection of cells for envelope analysis. For serum-sensitivity determination, bacterial samples were immediately diluted in Tris-HC1 pH 8.4 to give a cell concentration of 14-2.0 x 106/ml; 0.5 ml of this ENVIRONMENT AND E. COLI ENVELOPES I I suspension was added to 1.5 ml of human serum and viable counts were obtained by the pour-plate technique at the beginning of each test and after incubation for 1,2 and 3 h at 37°C (Taylor, 1978).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study (Taylor, 1978) the sensitivity of chemostat-grown strains o f E. coli to normal human serum was investigated. There was a tendency for slow-growing cells to be more resistant than rapidly-growing cells and for magnesium ion-limited (Mg-lim) cultures to be more sensitive than carbon-limited (C-lim) cultures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%