2020
DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of the horizontal metallic drive on reference dosimetry in the SNC 3D scanner water tank

Abstract: Accurate quantification of absorbed radiation dose is important for safe and effective delivery of radiation therapy. An important aspect to this is reference dosimetry, which is performed under reference conditions specified by international codes of practice. Such measurements are usually performed in a water phantom. In the Sun Nuclear Corporation (SNC) three-dimensional (3D) scanner water tank system the detector holder is fixed to a horizontal metallic drive rail (MDR) which is in close proximity to the a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison of different commercial motorized water phantom have shown that they can all achieve equivalent level of accuracy: dose difference within 1% and distance to agreement within 1 mm of each other [3]. Nevertheless, these phantoms do suffer from drawbacks; their large metallic arms can interfere with the radiation beam [4] and can cause waves that lead to measurement innacuracies [5] of up to 5% [6]. Risks of interference with the metallic arm usually restrict irradiations at normal incidence (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of different commercial motorized water phantom have shown that they can all achieve equivalent level of accuracy: dose difference within 1% and distance to agreement within 1 mm of each other [3]. Nevertheless, these phantoms do suffer from drawbacks; their large metallic arms can interfere with the radiation beam [4] and can cause waves that lead to measurement innacuracies [5] of up to 5% [6]. Risks of interference with the metallic arm usually restrict irradiations at normal incidence (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%