2002
DOI: 10.1002/fut.2214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of the introduction of Cubes on the Nasdaq‐100 index spot‐futures pricing relationship

Abstract: This paper examines the impact of the introduction of the Nasdaq‐100 Index Tracking Stock (referred to as Cubes) on the pricing relationship between Nasdaq‐100 futures and the underlying index. Observations obtained from tick‐by‐tick Nasdaq‐100 futures transactions and index value data support the hypothesis that the introduction of Cubes in March 1999 has led to improvements in the Nasdaq‐100 index futures pricing efficiency. Both the size and frequency of violations in futures price boundaries appear to be r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
35
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
8
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Switzer et al (2000) find that positive mispricing of the Standard and Poor's 500 Index Futures Market was reduced when SPDRs were introduced. Kurov and Lasser (2002) examine the impact of the Nasdaq100 Index Tracking Stock (ETF) on the underlying futures. The effect of decimalization of ETFs is studied by Chou and Chung (2006).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Switzer et al (2000) find that positive mispricing of the Standard and Poor's 500 Index Futures Market was reduced when SPDRs were introduced. Kurov and Lasser (2002) examine the impact of the Nasdaq100 Index Tracking Stock (ETF) on the underlying futures. The effect of decimalization of ETFs is studied by Chou and Chung (2006).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kurov and Lasser (2002) use estimated transaction costs of 0.15, 0.20, 0.35, and 0.50% of the index value in their study of futures arbitrage opportunities. To arrive at reasonable estimates of transaction costs that are more representative of the market conditions that were in effect at the time of this study, the mean mispricing value is divided by the mean futures price for each month of the sample.…”
Section: Journal Of Futures Markets Doi: 101002/futmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonsynchronous prices do not explain the improved efficiency observed since the pattern is obtained both with daily and hourly data. As for the advent of Cubes, Kurov and Lasser (2002) work with one year of transaction data concerning the near maturity of Nasdaq-100 futures. Whatever the assumed transaction cost levels, both the size and frequency of deviations decrease once Cubes are traded.…”
Section: Etfs and The Efficiency Of The Underlying Index Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 99%