2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of the MFM obesity protocol on cesarean delivery rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
2
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike our study, Schuster et al’s clinical protocol was associated with a slight increase in NICU admission, although these findings were not specific to obese women (24). This clinical protocol was tested in a single healthcare system, and analysis was limited to proxy indicators of neonatal morbidity (e.g., NICU admission) (24). In a hospital-based retrospective cohort study, Wolfe et al found that elective labor induction at 39 or 40 weeks, as compared to expectant management ≥39 weeks, was associated with increased risk of cesarean delivery and NICU admission among obese nulliparous patients with an unfavorable cervix (16).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike our study, Schuster et al’s clinical protocol was associated with a slight increase in NICU admission, although these findings were not specific to obese women (24). This clinical protocol was tested in a single healthcare system, and analysis was limited to proxy indicators of neonatal morbidity (e.g., NICU admission) (24). In a hospital-based retrospective cohort study, Wolfe et al found that elective labor induction at 39 or 40 weeks, as compared to expectant management ≥39 weeks, was associated with increased risk of cesarean delivery and NICU admission among obese nulliparous patients with an unfavorable cervix (16).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to our study, Schuster et al reported that a clinical protocol to induce obese women by their estimated due date reduced the rate of cesarean delivery, as compared to rates of cesarean delivery before the protocol was initiated (24). Unlike our study, Schuster et al’s clinical protocol was associated with a slight increase in NICU admission, although these findings were not specific to obese women (24). This clinical protocol was tested in a single healthcare system, and analysis was limited to proxy indicators of neonatal morbidity (e.g., NICU admission) (24).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Our data differ somewhat from those of Schuster et al , who examined 5,000 randomly selected women and showed a decrease in cesarean rate after implementation of a policy that included beginning delivery for patients with class III obesity by their estimated due date. That analysis did not stratify results by parity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Our data differ somewhat from those of Schuster et al (14), who examined 5,000 randomly selected women and showed a decrease in cesarean rate after implementation of a policy that included beginning delivery for patients with class III obesity by their estimated (15). A potentially important difference between our study and these two analyses is that our study included only women with class III obesity, whereas both the Schuster and the Gibbs Pickens analyses also included women with class I and II obesity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…5 Various approaches aimed to decrease cesarean delivery rates have been implemented, with differing degrees of success. [6][7][8][9][10][11] Fetal macrosomia, its management, and sequelae are constants in obstetric practice, as recently reviewed succinctly by Campbell 12 ; estimated fetal weight (EFW) is imprecise, 13 and overestimation of fetal size may lead to stronger tendency to opt for cesarean delivery for labor arrest. 14 It is the fetal head, however, that is the point of interface between the "passenger" and the "passageway."…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%