2014
DOI: 10.7603/s40680-014-0004-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of the muscle endurance training on the chronic low back pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over 60% of the studies had some concerns on measurement outcome bias due to the lack of assessor blinding on group allocation, with PROMs being subjective in nature. The 21 studies with a high risk of bias were removed in the sensitivity analysis, while another study [ 63 ] was removed from the NPRS results due to missing data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over 60% of the studies had some concerns on measurement outcome bias due to the lack of assessor blinding on group allocation, with PROMs being subjective in nature. The 21 studies with a high risk of bias were removed in the sensitivity analysis, while another study [ 63 ] was removed from the NPRS results due to missing data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only three of the included studies used ST in comparing MC and IM [ 21 , 34 ] and only two included studies comparing IT to IM [ 63 , 71 ]. Standardisation and use of a select set of objective outcomes would provide better comparison in future meta-analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 So unarguably, prevention of LBP appears to be highly important with suitable preventive programs as it was evident that back muscle endurance training could greatly reduce incidence rate of LBP. 9 The objective of the present study was to observe the importance of back muscle endurance training for LBP prevention. So, subjects with low and medium endurance PHT scores (according to Luoto et al classification) were selected as study population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%