Dear Sir: Permit me to refer to the very interesting paper on &dquo;The Effect of the Short Fibers in a Cotton on Its Processing Efliciency and Product ~uality, Part III: Pilot-Scale Processing of Yarns,&dquo; by J. I). Tallant et al. f1 ]. During the course of this paper the authors state :&dquo;One factor which does seem to stand out in the consideration of methods of characterizing short fibers is the necessity for having a fixed upper limit. Underwood ... and, more recently, Navkal ... , used 'flexible' measures for the upper limit such as 'percentage of weight ... shorter than the mo(le.' Both studies reported little, if any, importance in considering short fibers. It is felt that by. having different upper limits for each cotton they masked the real effects of short fibers, since, for a given yarn size and twist, the length of slippage should be essentially the same for any cotton, as long as there were no large differences in the coefficient of friction.&dquo;The above argument presupposes that the deterioration in yarn quality, particularly in yarn strength, with increased short fiber content is entirely due to the fact that at the time of yarn breakage the short fibers slip freely throughout their length and hence do not contribute materially to the yarn strength. This is not quite true, for, although fiber slippage may he the major reason for the low strength of yarns having a high short fiber content, another factor that cannot be overlooked is the occurrence of a more pronounced drafting wave during the drafting operations when the short fiber content is higher. Since the settings in the drafting zone can nearly always be altered to suit fibers of different staple lengths, the effect of short fibers of a given length, say 3 in., will be more harmful when present in a cotton with a longer average length than when they are present in a cotton with a shorter average length. In the latter case the drafting system can be set for the shorter cotton so that the short fibers of the given length will be under relatively better control than when the system is set to process longer cotton. Thus it will be appreciated that if the measure of short fiber content is to help us in assessing the yarn performance it should not be entirely independent of the average length of the cotton under consideration. It is interesting to note that some of the results reported by the authors themselves lend support to this belief. It is reported that in the cotton studied the short fiber content appeared to have no influence on the twist required for maximum skein tenacity in coarse and medium yarns. There were indications that the short fiber content does affect the twist necessary for maximum strength in the finer yarn size, but, even these indications, the authors caution, must be taken with qualification. They also refer to earlier work [ l, 3 done by them which showed that for all cottons, the twist required for maximum strength is not influenced by the short fiber content.If the authors' contention that the deterioration in ...