2004
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20047180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of the surface distribution of elements on measuring the magnetic field of chemically peculiar stars

Abstract: Abstract.A non-homogeneous distribution over the stellar surface of the chemical elements and the presence of a large-scale magnetic field are invoked in order to explain the periodic line strength, photometric and magnetic variability of magnetic chemically peculiar stars. In such a framework, the variability period is identical to the rotational period. In magnetic chemically peculiar stars, the so-called effective magnetic field H eff , the average over the visible stellar disk of the longitudinal field com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mathys (1991) proposed a slightly longer period, P rot = 12.4610 d, based solely on magnetic measurements. The latest revision of the rotation period of HD 24712 was performed by Leone & Catanzaro (2004), who derived P rot = 12.4582 ± 0.0006 day based on analysis of equivalent width data available from 1968 to 2002. A small discrepency exists between the period determined by Mathys (based solely on magnetic field data) and the periods determined using equivalent width and photometric data.…”
Section: Hd 24712 = Hr 1217mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mathys (1991) proposed a slightly longer period, P rot = 12.4610 d, based solely on magnetic measurements. The latest revision of the rotation period of HD 24712 was performed by Leone & Catanzaro (2004), who derived P rot = 12.4582 ± 0.0006 day based on analysis of equivalent width data available from 1968 to 2002. A small discrepency exists between the period determined by Mathys (based solely on magnetic field data) and the periods determined using equivalent width and photometric data.…”
Section: Hd 24712 = Hr 1217mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asterisks -B z data from Mathys (1991) and Mathys & Hubrig (1997) and W λ / W data from Bonsack (1979). Open squares -B z data from Leone & Catanzaro (2004) and W λ / W data from pulsational observations. Pluses (+) represent Preston's (1972) B z measurements from TiCrFe lines.…”
Section: Hd 24712 = Hr 1217mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variability period found by Preston (1972) was confirmed by photometric observations by Wolff & Morrison (1973). Many studies of the magnetic field of HD 24712 have been carried out (Preston 1972;Brown & Landstreet 1981;Mathys 1991Mathys , 1994Mathys & Hubrig 1997;Ryabchikova et al 1997;Leone et al 2000;Wade et al 2000a;Leone & Catanzaro 2004;Ryabchikova et al 2005Ryabchikova et al , 2007. Below we will use some of these measurements for improving the rotational period of the star.…”
Section: Hd 24712mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…For the period search we compiled a list of all published longitudinal magnetic field measurements derived from the spectral lines of Fe-peak elements, which should be among the least variable lines in the spectrum of HD 24712. This list includes the TiCrFe B z data published by Preston (1972), measurements from the Fe i lines by Mathys (1991) and Mathys & Hubrig (1997), longitudinal field derived from the LSD Stokes V profiles of Fe-peak elements by Wade et al (2000a) and Ryabchikova et al (2005), measurements by Leone & Catanzaro (2004) and, finally, measurements from the recent spectroscopic study of pulsations in the atmosphere of HD 24712 performed by Ryabchikova et al (2007). Photopolarimetric longitudinal magnetic field measurements from the Hβ line by Ryabchikova et al (1997) were also included.…”
Section: Rotational Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often a series of four exposures with a sequence a 1 , a 2 , a 2 , a 1 is obtained to measure a Stokes parameter by subtracting any possible derivative in time. A 100 m s −1 radial velocity shift between the ordinary and extraordinary beams could let Stokes V/I be interpreted as a magnetic field of 100 Gauss (Leone & Catanzaro 2004). Unchecked alignements have been wrongly interpreted as the presence of magnetic fields on the central star of Planetary Nebulae (Leone et al 2011).…”
Section: Observational Strategy and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%