2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 2013
DOI: 10.1109/smc.2013.317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of the Viewing Distance of Stimulus on SSVEP Response for Use in Brain-Computer Interfaces

Abstract: Abstract-Most visual stimulators used in steady state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) based brain-computer interface (BCI) to elicit SSVEP response are set close to the BCI system limiting the portability and the applications of the system. Our aim is to develop a portable SSVEP based BCI adaptable to the change of the viewing distance of the stimulator which will allow users to operate the BCI without being restricted to a particular area. This study (1) investigates the impact of the distance between the use… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with PC-200, the contrast of the stimulus is same, but the size of the stimulus in the field of view becomes smaller as the viewing distance increases, and this may result in a weakened SSVEP response. There are several studies support our explanation [37], [38], and it has been reported that the size of the stimulus is the most important parameter affecting the SSVEP classification accuracy [39].…”
Section: Discussion a Feasibility From Pc-ssvep To Ar-ssvepsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Compared with PC-200, the contrast of the stimulus is same, but the size of the stimulus in the field of view becomes smaller as the viewing distance increases, and this may result in a weakened SSVEP response. There are several studies support our explanation [37], [38], and it has been reported that the size of the stimulus is the most important parameter affecting the SSVEP classification accuracy [39].…”
Section: Discussion a Feasibility From Pc-ssvep To Ar-ssvepsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…However, the differences of the mean accuracies at different viewing distances are not significant for all attended frequencies. In our previous study [17], the accuracies at 250cm and 350cm were very low without intensities compensation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…During the experiment, the visual stimulator board comprising 4 LEDs was present to the subject at four viewing distances 60cm, 150cm, 250cm and 350cm. In our previous study [17], it was found that the impact of the viewing distance can be compensated by changing the intensities of the visual stimuli. Therefore, the intensities of LEDs presented to the subjects were different at different viewing distance.…”
Section: Visual Stimuli and Experiments Protocolmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…where t refers to time and n refers to the number of channels. Through the use of MVAR, EEG data set X can be expressed as the following autoregressive process ( Bartels and Zeki, 2004):…”
Section: Dtf and Flow Gainmentioning
confidence: 99%