2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Theta Burst Stimulation Over the Primary Motor Cortex on Experimental Hamstring Pain: A Randomized, Controlled Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, techniques aimed at restoring corticomotor excitability, and therefore mechanical sensitivity, may aid the rehabilitation process following a hamstring injury. Indeed, the use of noninvasive brain stimulation has shown promise as a means of expediting recovery of experimental and clinical musculoskeletal pain (Borovskis et al., 2021; Cavaleri et al., 2019; Moisset et al., 2016; Moukhaiber et al., 2022; O'Connell et al., 2018) and mechanical sensitivity has been suggested as a potential marker for evaluating the success of such strategies (Pedersini et al., 2020). However, given that numerical ratings of pain and function in the present study were not impacted by changes in corticomotor excitability, these clinical implications remain speculative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, techniques aimed at restoring corticomotor excitability, and therefore mechanical sensitivity, may aid the rehabilitation process following a hamstring injury. Indeed, the use of noninvasive brain stimulation has shown promise as a means of expediting recovery of experimental and clinical musculoskeletal pain (Borovskis et al., 2021; Cavaleri et al., 2019; Moisset et al., 2016; Moukhaiber et al., 2022; O'Connell et al., 2018) and mechanical sensitivity has been suggested as a potential marker for evaluating the success of such strategies (Pedersini et al., 2020). However, given that numerical ratings of pain and function in the present study were not impacted by changes in corticomotor excitability, these clinical implications remain speculative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ‘excitatory’ protocol was selected as high frequency (excitatory) rTMS over the left DLPFC has previously been shown to decrease motion perception and induce reductions in long-range intrinsic functional connectivity (correlating with symptom improvement) in people with MdDS [ 33 , 34 ]. Stimuli were delivered at 90% of the resting motor threshold (rMT) determined during the first treatment day [ 70 , 71 ]. Resting motor threshold was defined as the minimum intensity at which 5 out of 10 stimuli, delivered to the “hotspot” of the first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI) representation, evoked a peak-to-peak motor evoked potential (identified using electromyography) of at least 0.05 mV in the resting muscle [ 72 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%