2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of three-dimensional geometrical changes during adolescent growth on the biomechanics of a spinal motion segment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Neither can OFAT analyses reveal possible interactions between parameters, nor do they allow performing a meaningful uncertainty analysis of the model's output and only allow for a very constrained form of SA. Meijer et al used this technique to investigate the impact of changing anatomy during adolescent growth and inter-personal variability in anatomical parameters for the L3-L4 segment on the spinal stiffness (Meijer et al, 2010(Meijer et al, , 2011.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neither can OFAT analyses reveal possible interactions between parameters, nor do they allow performing a meaningful uncertainty analysis of the model's output and only allow for a very constrained form of SA. Meijer et al used this technique to investigate the impact of changing anatomy during adolescent growth and inter-personal variability in anatomical parameters for the L3-L4 segment on the spinal stiffness (Meijer et al, 2010(Meijer et al, , 2011.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models can be geometrically parameterized [4]- [6], subjectspecific [3], [7]- [10], or a combination of both [11]- [14]. The former can provide general information about pathology mechanisms or fracture risks, but not about personalized biomechanics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conclusions reached through the hypothesis are very reasonable, taking into account that the effect of geometrical changes of the vertebrae on spinal stiffness remains poorly understood [29,40] and knowledge of the spiné s growth is remarkably limited [22].…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 70%