2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of three low-cost engineering treatments on driver fatigue: A driving simulator study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies on the effects of performing dualtask procedure, involving driving a vehicle and talking on a mobile phone, on the efficiency of performing the main (driving) task indicate that this efficiency drops very seriously, which is reflected in the increased number of violent braking episodes, lack of control, neglecting rear mirror view and impaired strategies for recognizing objects on the road [55]. The study of Balk et al [56] realised on a low fidelity driving simulator has shown that the percentage of fixations on the vehicles involved in hazardous events throughout the test was greater for the driving-only condition than driving and talking on a mobile (40% vs. 29%). The mean time spent looking at the hazardous vehicles was greater for the driving-only…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies on the effects of performing dualtask procedure, involving driving a vehicle and talking on a mobile phone, on the efficiency of performing the main (driving) task indicate that this efficiency drops very seriously, which is reflected in the increased number of violent braking episodes, lack of control, neglecting rear mirror view and impaired strategies for recognizing objects on the road [55]. The study of Balk et al [56] realised on a low fidelity driving simulator has shown that the percentage of fixations on the vehicles involved in hazardous events throughout the test was greater for the driving-only condition than driving and talking on a mobile (40% vs. 29%). The mean time spent looking at the hazardous vehicles was greater for the driving-only…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers typically use blinking frequency to evaluate driving fatigue and workloads [7,8,9,10]; gazing and scanning, however, are only considered as effective means to gather traffic information and recognize drivers’ intentions [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Common analysis metrics include gaze duration, gaze frequency, saccade duration, saccade frequency, saccade amplitude, and various transition-based parameters between fixation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An aspect of the effectiveness of rumble strips that has not previously been examined is the stability of the alerting effect. That is, previous research has demonstrated the immediate effect that hitting a single rumble strip can have (Anund et al ., ; Merat and Jamson, ); however, it is unknown what the effect is of repeated rumble strip hits. The study by Anund et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Driving simulators studies also demonstrate the alerting effects of hitting a rumble strip. Significant reductions in physiological sleepiness indices and reduced variability of lateral position occur after hitting a rumble strip (Anund et al, 2008;Merat and Jamson, 2013). However, the alerting effect from hitting a rumble strip appears to be transient (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%