1981
DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(81)90001-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of time pressure on risky choice behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
213
3
5

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 423 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
6
213
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…As we found in Study 2, a cap on response time increased adherence to the recognition heuristic. This result, however, does not simply echo the frequent observation that under time pressure people appear to pay increased attention to the more important attributes in a decision context (e.g., Ben Zur & Breznitz, 1981;Böckenholt & Kroeger, 1993;Kerstholt, 1995;Payne, Bettman, & Johnson, 1988;Wallsten & Barton, 1982). In our view, the reason people make more use of the recognition heuristic under a limited response-time budget is that the retrieval of recognition information precedes that of other pieces of information and requires little to no cognitive effort.…”
Section: Under What Conditions Do People Use the Recognition Heuristic?contrasting
confidence: 65%
“…As we found in Study 2, a cap on response time increased adherence to the recognition heuristic. This result, however, does not simply echo the frequent observation that under time pressure people appear to pay increased attention to the more important attributes in a decision context (e.g., Ben Zur & Breznitz, 1981;Böckenholt & Kroeger, 1993;Kerstholt, 1995;Payne, Bettman, & Johnson, 1988;Wallsten & Barton, 1982). In our view, the reason people make more use of the recognition heuristic under a limited response-time budget is that the retrieval of recognition information precedes that of other pieces of information and requires little to no cognitive effort.…”
Section: Under What Conditions Do People Use the Recognition Heuristic?contrasting
confidence: 65%
“…There was a general consensus about a negative effect of time pressure on JDM (Peterson & Maher, 1976;Anderson, 1976;Schuler, 1980;Ben Zur & Breznitz, 1981;Choo, 1986;McDaniel, 1990;Glover, 1997;Brown, 1999;Asare et al, 2000;Tortman et al, 2011). Our study findings did not shift from this trend.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence suggests that auditors" judgments are affected when dealing with risky or important decisions under the effect of time pressure, as they tend to choose less risky decisions than auditors with more available time (Ben Zur & Breznitz, 1981;Diaz 2005). Correspondingly, Sevenson and Edland (1987) argue that auditors will tend to focus on the most critical areas of the client"s account when time pressure is present.…”
Section: Mental Model For Ssamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, under TP, consumers tend to: (a) process information faster (e.g., Ben-Zur & Breznitz, 1981), (b) filter information (Miller, 1960), choose products using heuristics (Hamlin, 2010;Pachur & Hertwig, 2006;Scheibehenne, Miesler, & Todd, 2007;Suri & Monroe, 2003), but (c) accomplish high utility choices (Kocher & Sutter, 2006). Moreover, high utility choices may be achieved by focusing in some of the attributes (e.g., Wright, 1974) while ignoring some options in the assortment (Beach, 1993) or by using lexicographic strategies (Rieskamp & Hoffrage, 2008), such as deciding upon more visual than textual information (Pieters & Warlop, 1999).…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%