2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00238-019-01516-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of TopClosure® TRS in the treatment of large abdominal wall defect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Abdominal wall defects are often caused by infection or dehiscence of post-operative incisions without involving the full-thickness abdominal wall. Five retrospective studies reported the application of TopClosure® [ 82 ], KeKe® [ 75 ], Proxiderm® [ 30 ] and homemade devices, such as rubber bands [ 38 ] and nice knots [ 2 ], in 24 patients. Four retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis of the mean healing time of abdominal wall defects [ 30 , 38 , 75 , 82 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Abdominal wall defects are often caused by infection or dehiscence of post-operative incisions without involving the full-thickness abdominal wall. Five retrospective studies reported the application of TopClosure® [ 82 ], KeKe® [ 75 ], Proxiderm® [ 30 ] and homemade devices, such as rubber bands [ 38 ] and nice knots [ 2 ], in 24 patients. Four retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis of the mean healing time of abdominal wall defects [ 30 , 38 , 75 , 82 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five retrospective studies reported the application of TopClosure® [ 82 ], KeKe® [ 75 ], Proxiderm® [ 30 ] and homemade devices, such as rubber bands [ 38 ] and nice knots [ 2 ], in 24 patients. Four retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis of the mean healing time of abdominal wall defects [ 30 , 38 , 75 , 82 ]. The pooled median wound closure time was 12.853 days (95% CI = 9.444-16.227, I 2 = 72%, p = 0.01) ( Figure 7a ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%