2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.03.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Traction Force and Hip Abduction Angle on Pudendal Nerve Compression in Hip Arthroscopy: A Cadaveric Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Factors other than the amount of traction force might be of importance, as the position and the shape of the perineal post, anatomical differences and the position of the joint. 13 Hip arthroscopy performed without a perineal post might be promising in preventing the occurrence of nerve damage, 14 as described by Mei-ho et al 15 A major limitation of our study is that only patients with a body length up to 1.74 m could be included. The average height of the Dutch population of 20 years of age in 2016 was 1.74 m for women and 1.81 m for men.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors other than the amount of traction force might be of importance, as the position and the shape of the perineal post, anatomical differences and the position of the joint. 13 Hip arthroscopy performed without a perineal post might be promising in preventing the occurrence of nerve damage, 14 as described by Mei-ho et al 15 A major limitation of our study is that only patients with a body length up to 1.74 m could be included. The average height of the Dutch population of 20 years of age in 2016 was 1.74 m for women and 1.81 m for men.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a cadaveric model has demonstrated that hip flexion up to 45° and increasing traction up to 40 kg increases pudendal nerve compression. 21 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28,29 In both studies' sham groups, patients are undergoing surgery with a perineal posteassisted distraction technique with risks of temporary and/or permanent pudendal neuralgia; scrotal, labial, and/or vaginal necrosis; genitalia injury; sex organ damage; sexual dysfunction; and urologic dysfunction at rates of up to 25%. [30][31][32][33] Portal placement (lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury risk of up to 15%) and joint entry alone may cause iatrogenic injury (irreversible injury to articular cartilage and/or labrum). 34,35 In the sham group in one of the aforementioned studies, an interportal capsulotomy is performed but not repaired, leaving the hip at risk of postoperative instability and pain, as well as yielding a significantly increased risk of revision owing to microinstability (or even subluxation or dislocation).…”
Section: Author Reply To "Placebomentioning
confidence: 99%