2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Tranexamic Acid on Operative and Postoperative Blood Loss in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These included one meeting ( 15 ), two registered studies without results ( 16 , 17 ), one study performed on posterior lumbar interbody fusion ( 18 ), two studies that were unable to extract data from patients with TLIF ( 19 , 20 ), one study that did not use tranexamic acid ( 21 ), and one study that compared oral tranexamic acid with intravenous use ( 22 ). Finally, five trials with three RCT studies and two retrospective studies, totaling 984 patients, were included in our study ( 10 , 11 , 12 , 23 , 24 ). The literature screening process is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These included one meeting ( 15 ), two registered studies without results ( 16 , 17 ), one study performed on posterior lumbar interbody fusion ( 18 ), two studies that were unable to extract data from patients with TLIF ( 19 , 20 ), one study that did not use tranexamic acid ( 21 ), and one study that compared oral tranexamic acid with intravenous use ( 22 ). Finally, five trials with three RCT studies and two retrospective studies, totaling 984 patients, were included in our study ( 10 , 11 , 12 , 23 , 24 ). The literature screening process is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Study Country Date range Design No. of subjects Age (years) TXA Control TXA Control He et al ( 11 ) China July 2018–February 2019 RCT 20 20 57.95 ± 12.44 57.9 ± 11.76 Kanhere et al ( 10 ) USA January 2017–July 2021 Cohort study 183 315 59.3 ± 11.7 61.4 ± 10.6 Mallepally et al ( 23 ) India November 2017–October 2018 Case controlled 175 75 55.8 ± 13.0 55.3 ± 12.8 Wang et al ( 12 ) China March 2014–December 2016 RCT 39 41 41.2 ± 10.3 42.5 ± 9.5 Zhang et al ( 24 ) ...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations