Five different types of β-diketiminate ligands, bearing electrondonating to strongly electron-withdrawing substituents, were synthesized and used in the synthesis of Cp* ruthenium complexes (Cp* = η 5 -C 5 Me 5 ). One series consists of complexes with a covalent Ru III −Cl bond, and the other series features a reduced Ru II center, where the chloride is abstracted by treatment of the corresponding Ru III compounds with Zn or Mg. All compounds were characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, UV−visible spectroscopy, and cyclic voltammetry. In the case of Ru II complexes, solution NMR techniques provided key information regarding the electronic and structural differences induced by the different β-diketiminate ligands employed. Capitalizing on the facile reduction−oxidation cycle of the Cp* ruthenium β-diketiminato complexes, catalytic atom transfer radical addition (ATRA) and cyclization (ATRC) reactions were performed on relevant substrates. The turnover rates are strongly dependent on the type of β-diketiminate used, where ligands with electron-withdrawing substituents, i.e., trifluoromethyl groups, provided complexes that efficiently catalyze the addition of CCl 4 or toluenesulfonyl chloride to styrene. In contrast, complexes with electron-donating substituents on the β-diketiminate promoted efficient ATR cyclization of N-allyl-N-phenyltrichloroacetamide and 2,2,2-trichloroethyl ether. Thus, the overall product conversion and yield are dependent on matching the ligand substitution pattern of the catalyst to the type of substrate.