2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0376-7388(02)00308-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of turbulence promoter on cross-flow microfiltration of skim milk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
1
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
39
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Many authors have experimentally and numerically investigated the flow around a turbulence promoter. Studies concerning the use of static turbulence promoters (Krstic et al, 2002;Ranade and Kumar, 2006;Dendukuri, Karode and Kumar, 2005) demonstrated that membrane fouling can be reduced by increasing the wall shear stress in the vicinity of the membrane surface. Moulin et al (1999) and Moulin, Veyret and Charbit (2001) showed significant boost in filtration fluxes in the presence of Dean vortices, compared to the classical tubular membranes under the same operational conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors have experimentally and numerically investigated the flow around a turbulence promoter. Studies concerning the use of static turbulence promoters (Krstic et al, 2002;Ranade and Kumar, 2006;Dendukuri, Karode and Kumar, 2005) demonstrated that membrane fouling can be reduced by increasing the wall shear stress in the vicinity of the membrane surface. Moulin et al (1999) and Moulin, Veyret and Charbit (2001) showed significant boost in filtration fluxes in the presence of Dean vortices, compared to the classical tubular membranes under the same operational conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of dynamic membranes [19] or application of external forces like electric field and ultrasound, application of Gas/air sparging [20] are other techniques for enhancement of membrane separation performance. The use of spacers (in organic polymeric membranes) and turbulence promoters (in tubular ceramic membranes to create turbulent flow at the surface of the membrane or to increase shear) also prove their efficiency in improvement of membrane separation performance in many cases [21][22][23][24][25][26]. However, the introduction of spacer and turbulence promoters increase the drop of TMP along the membrane and in some cases the washing of the system after use becomes more challenging.…”
Section: Citationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Newtonian fluids, such as, an aqueous solution, are being turbulent flow in most industrial applications, but within small diameter tubes or narrow niches, the turbulence is not high enough to develop adequate share force to build adequate flux [3,4].…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%