2013
DOI: 10.1080/1062726x.2013.788445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Twitter Use on Politicians’ Credibility and Attitudes toward Politicians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Social Media: Social media outlets, including Facebook and Twitter, have been the subject of several credibility studies. However, such studies focus on the perceived credibility of the person who posted the information (e.g., Cunningham & Bright, 2012;Edwards, Spence, Gentile, Edwards, & Edwards, 2013;Hwang, 2013;Park, Xiang, Josiam, & Kim, 2014) or perceived credibility of the social media site itself (e.g., Lee & Ahn, 2013;Schmierbach & OeldorfHirsch, 2012); they tend not to examine the perceived credibility of the social media content directly (e.g., Castillo, Mendoza, & Poblete, 2013). A message credibility scale, such as the one proposed here, creates possibilities for future research to examine how the content of the message is perceived.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social Media: Social media outlets, including Facebook and Twitter, have been the subject of several credibility studies. However, such studies focus on the perceived credibility of the person who posted the information (e.g., Cunningham & Bright, 2012;Edwards, Spence, Gentile, Edwards, & Edwards, 2013;Hwang, 2013;Park, Xiang, Josiam, & Kim, 2014) or perceived credibility of the social media site itself (e.g., Lee & Ahn, 2013;Schmierbach & OeldorfHirsch, 2012); they tend not to examine the perceived credibility of the social media content directly (e.g., Castillo, Mendoza, & Poblete, 2013). A message credibility scale, such as the one proposed here, creates possibilities for future research to examine how the content of the message is perceived.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skala atau item yang secara eksklusif mengukur kewibawaan mesej berguna dalam pelbagai situasi, khususnya platform media sosial, termasuk Facebook dan Twitter yang telah menjadi subjek beberapa kajian kewibawaan lepas. Walau bagaimanapun, kajian sedemikian memberi tumpuan kepada tanggapan kewibawaan pengguna yang memaparkan maklumat (Edwards, Spence, Gentile, Edwards & Edwards, 2013;Hwang, 2013;Park, Xiang, Josiam & Kim, 2014;Pressgrove & Kim, 2018) atau kewibawaan laman media sosial sebagai medium yang dipercayai (Lee & Ahn, 2013;Schmierbach & Oeldorf-Hirsch, 2012). Sebaliknya, terdapat kajian terhad mengenai penilaian kandungan media sosial secara langsung (Alrubaian, Al-Qurishi, Hassan & Alamri, 2018;Castillo et al, 2013).…”
Section: Permasalahan Kajianunclassified
“…Se eligi o Twitter por su presencia en el ciberespacio, por el perfil de sus usuarios y por las caracter ısticas que han permitido su posicionamiento entre las redes sociales: sencillez, una estructura colaborativa, permite compartir contenidos multimedia, es interactiva, abierta (excepto que sea una decisi on del usuario) y ''una herramienta pensada en conceptos de movilidad'' (Blanco y Sueiro, 2014). Las investigaciones realizadas en los ultimos años reflejan el impacto de su uso en la sociedad (Hwang, 2013; Hennig-Thurau, Wiertz y Feldhaus, 2015; Xu, Lin y Haridakis, 2015); en el caso que nos ocupa, la tem atica familia, que tambi en ha sido estudiada de una manera directa o indirecta (Arnold, 2005; Rodr ıguez Gonz alez, Marauri Castillo y Cantalapiedra Gonz alez, 2013; Gangopadhyay y Dhar, 2015), pod ıa ser asumida, al menos desde dos perspectivas. La primera: como tem atica de debate, sea al comentar informaciones publicadas por los medios de comunicaci on o a partir del propio inter es de los usuarios de la red.…”
Section: Etodounclassified