2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of two point mutations in GDF-5 on ectopic bone formation in a β-tricalciumphosphate scaffold

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the presence of a flexible spring-loaded latch in MBPR-IB, GDF5 shows a 10-to 20-fold higher affinity for MBPR-IB than MBPR-IA, which does not contain the spring and has a higher energy requirement for the GDF5: MBPR-IA complex [Nickel et al, 2005;Kotzsch et al, 2009]. Furthermore, compared to BMP2, point mutations introduced in GDF5 at the sites that are involved in binding to MBPR-I lead to an enhanced ectopic osteogenesis as BMP2 in a ␤ -tricalcium phosphate ( ␤ -TCP) ceramic scaffold [Kasten et al, 2010]. Whether the GDF5 mutant would show altered MBPR-IA and MBPR-IB binding affinity and whether other biological effects, such as angiogenic properties, might exist was not investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the presence of a flexible spring-loaded latch in MBPR-IB, GDF5 shows a 10-to 20-fold higher affinity for MBPR-IB than MBPR-IA, which does not contain the spring and has a higher energy requirement for the GDF5: MBPR-IA complex [Nickel et al, 2005;Kotzsch et al, 2009]. Furthermore, compared to BMP2, point mutations introduced in GDF5 at the sites that are involved in binding to MBPR-I lead to an enhanced ectopic osteogenesis as BMP2 in a ␤ -tricalcium phosphate ( ␤ -TCP) ceramic scaffold [Kasten et al, 2010]. Whether the GDF5 mutant would show altered MBPR-IA and MBPR-IB binding affinity and whether other biological effects, such as angiogenic properties, might exist was not investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As autogenously harvested bone transplants are limited and callus distraction is not feasible in every defect site, alternative strategies involving the use of bone substitutes, bone marrow stromal cells (BMSC), and growth factors have successfully been explored [Niemeyer et al, 2009a, b;Janicki et al, 2010;Kasten et al, 2010]. It is known that vascularization is important and tightly regulated in bone healing [DePalma et al, 1972;Burchardt and Enneking, 1978].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…growth and restoration comprise a well-orchestrated interplay47 of various factors and mediators responsible for cellular recruitment,48 proliferation and differentiation. Secreted growth factors, in particular 49 Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMPs) and Growth and Differentiation 50 Factors (GDFs), play a key role as they exert their effects on mesenchy-51 mal stem cells by promoting their differentiation into the chondro-or 52 osteogenic lineage [1,2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%