2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2008.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of ultrasound on osteogenesis in the vertically distracted edentulous mandible. A double-blind trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One trial received support from the implant manufacturer; however, the trial was not designed to test the implants, but the augmentation techniques [23]. The authors of six trials declared that no support was received from commercial parties whose products were being tested in the trials [3,7,8,16,18,30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…One trial received support from the implant manufacturer; however, the trial was not designed to test the implants, but the augmentation techniques [23]. The authors of six trials declared that no support was received from commercial parties whose products were being tested in the trials [3,7,8,16,18,30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When evaluating which are the most effective augmentation techniques for vertical ridge augmentation, eight trials were included [3,7,8,15,16,18,23,30]. Osteodistraction osteogenesis, various GBR techniques, autogenous onlay block grafting and inlay grafting with both autogenous bone and bone substitutes can be successful for augmenting bone vertically; however, there is insufficient evidence to suggest if one technique is preferable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations