2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-016-2759-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of underwater light availability dynamics on benthic macrophyte communities in a Baltic Sea archipelago coast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although not measured in this study, reduced light availability for S. trinodis settled on A. trapezia is likely to result in morphological differences between habitats due to potentially greater number of suspended sediments in the water column in soft sediments in contrast to the rocky reef. Just as terrestrial plants modify growth to better access light (Koch et al 2015), the morphology of macroalgae commonly varies with light availability (Monro and Poore 2004, Rohde et al 2008, Luhtala et al 2016.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not measured in this study, reduced light availability for S. trinodis settled on A. trapezia is likely to result in morphological differences between habitats due to potentially greater number of suspended sediments in the water column in soft sediments in contrast to the rocky reef. Just as terrestrial plants modify growth to better access light (Koch et al 2015), the morphology of macroalgae commonly varies with light availability (Monro and Poore 2004, Rohde et al 2008, Luhtala et al 2016.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different types of macrophyte (e.g., emergent, rooted submerged, and free-floating) utilize environmental resources (nutrients and light) in specific ways and they also differ in their response to environmental changes (Akasaka and Takamura, 2011;Netten et al, 2011). For example, while submerged plants are strongly dependent on underwater light (Luhtala et al, 2017), free-floating plants have primacy in obtaining this resource (Lacoul and Freedman, 2006), but are more affected by availability of nutrients in the water column (Giblin et al, 2014). In contrast, emergent macrophytes in their early developmental stages are influenced by light availability and they obtain nutrients from sediment, being expected as less dependent on water quality than other life forms (Akasaka et al, 2010;Akasaka and Takamura, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these ecosystems, different life forms (e.g., emergent, rooted submerged, and free-floating) use resources (e.g., light and nutrients) in specific ways and also differed in their response to environmental changes (Akasaka and Takamura, 2011 ; Netten et al, 2011 ; Alahuhta et al, 2013a ). For example, while submerged plants are strongly dependent on under-water light (Sand-Jensen and Sondergaard, 1979 ; Chambers and Kalff, 1985 ; Zhang et al, 2012 ; Luhtala et al, 2017 ), free-floating plants have primacy in obtaining this resource (Lacoul and Freedman, 2006 ), but are more affected by nutrients availability in the water column (Henry-Silva et al, 2008 ; Giblin et al, 2014 ). On the contrary, emergent macrophytes are influenced by light availability only in the early stage of development and obtain nutrients from sediment, being expected as less dependent on water quality than other life forms (Akasaka et al, 2010 ; Akasaka and Takamura, 2011 ) (but see O'Hare et al, 2012 ; Alahuhta et al, 2013a , b ; for contrasting results).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%