2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2012.07.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of uniform capture molecule orientation on biosensor sensitivity: Dependence on analyte properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
59
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
7
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference was totally due to the improved association rate. This result confirmed the binding functionality of the construct expressed in the cytoplasm and suggests that despite having similar overall mass, the relative length and/or folding of the different tags can influence the accessibility and actual binding of the two constructs to the antigen epitope, as already noticed by other authors [25,26]. We cannot rule out that the small observed differences in terms of antibody binding capacity were due to minimal stability variation of the different constructs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The difference was totally due to the improved association rate. This result confirmed the binding functionality of the construct expressed in the cytoplasm and suggests that despite having similar overall mass, the relative length and/or folding of the different tags can influence the accessibility and actual binding of the two constructs to the antigen epitope, as already noticed by other authors [25,26]. We cannot rule out that the small observed differences in terms of antibody binding capacity were due to minimal stability variation of the different constructs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…When different assay formats yield consistent results, this suggests that the biological activity of the assay reagents has not been compromised by immobilization. Although discrepant results from biosensor assays using different immobilization formats have been reported, 51,52,53 in their meta-analysis benchmarking study of optical biosensor data from over 1200 publications, Rich and Myszka 54 state that only a few investigators have directly compared multiple immobilization and capture methods to address the potential caveats associated with protein immobilization methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method results in random orientation of the antibody. Orienting single domain antigen-binding fragments, also known as VHHs or nanobodies, on sensor surfaces by click chemistry leads to greatly improved sensitivity for biosensors (Trilling et al, 2013, 2014). The small size of VHHs (~15 kDa) and their excellent thermal and chemical stability profile make them suitable for numerous diagnostic and therapeutic applications (De Meyer et al, 2014; Muyldermans, 2013; Siontorou 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small size of VHHs (~15 kDa) and their excellent thermal and chemical stability profile make them suitable for numerous diagnostic and therapeutic applications (De Meyer et al, 2014; Muyldermans, 2013; Siontorou 2013). Since a large percentage of the VHH surface is involved in binding interactions, it is essential to create a uniform orientation using site-specific modifications (Trilling et al, 2013, 2014) to improve the biosensor’s performance. To achieve consistency in orientation, we previously used a combination of sortase-mediated trans-peptidation reactions and ‘click’ chemistry to site-specifically link VHHs with linkers coated onto GO (Agrawal et al, 2008; Chen et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%