2020
DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2020.1815835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of using a PORP to reconstruct the ossicular chain under otoendoscopy with and without a malleus handle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason may be that due to the limited exposure of the posterior wall of the mastoid through the ear incision and the blind area of the visual field under “direct vision” under the otomicroscopy, the contouring of the mastoid and the lateral wall of the tympanic sinus and the treatment of diseased tissue under otoendoscopy will have obvious advantages. Besides, the otoendoscopy can cross the narrow ear canal and observe deep cavities from multiple angles and in-depth and can clearly enlarge the observation field and comprehensively observe the lesion field, avoiding surgical errors, reducing unnecessary damage, and then improving the efficacy of surgery and minimizing the occurrence of adverse reactions [ 19 ]. However, the otoendoscopy is a 2D imaging, has a small angle of view, and must be operated with one hand; besides, its lens is susceptible to contamination by blood and tissue fragments and loses the field of vision; therefore, it is more difficult to use otoendoscopy surgery alone [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason may be that due to the limited exposure of the posterior wall of the mastoid through the ear incision and the blind area of the visual field under “direct vision” under the otomicroscopy, the contouring of the mastoid and the lateral wall of the tympanic sinus and the treatment of diseased tissue under otoendoscopy will have obvious advantages. Besides, the otoendoscopy can cross the narrow ear canal and observe deep cavities from multiple angles and in-depth and can clearly enlarge the observation field and comprehensively observe the lesion field, avoiding surgical errors, reducing unnecessary damage, and then improving the efficacy of surgery and minimizing the occurrence of adverse reactions [ 19 ]. However, the otoendoscopy is a 2D imaging, has a small angle of view, and must be operated with one hand; besides, its lens is susceptible to contamination by blood and tissue fragments and loses the field of vision; therefore, it is more difficult to use otoendoscopy surgery alone [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, partial excision of the malleus handle may result in a nonhealing perforation 7,8 . It is unclear whether the malleus handle affects hearing outcomes after tympanoplasty; the results of some studies suggest that the absence of a malleus handle does not affect postoperative hearing restoration, 9,10 whereas the results of other studies suggest that hearing outcomes are improved when the malleus handle is preserved 11,12 . However, previous studies have focused on small‐to‐medium‐sized perforations with malleus handle preservation 2–8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 7 , 8 It is unclear whether the malleus handle affects hearing outcomes after tympanoplasty; the results of some studies suggest that the absence of a malleus handle does not affect postoperative hearing restoration, 9 , 10 whereas the results of other studies suggest that hearing outcomes are improved when the malleus handle is preserved. 11 , 12 However, previous studies have focused on small‐to‐medium‐sized perforations with malleus handle preservation. 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 Small perforations usually heal rapidly 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 and may not accurately reflect the effects of the malleus handle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%