2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.09.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of using hybrid phase change materials on thermal management of photovoltaic panels – An experimental study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the using of finned PCM, PV-temperature reduction values mostly range between 5 and 20 °C, while max. value is about 26.6 °C obtained by Qasim et al (2020) who used RT27 having Tm = 26.6 °C, very close to the ideal PV temperature of 25 °C where PV module performs at its best. Effect of fin insertion inside PCM reduced PV-surface temperature due to the fact that presence of fins increased conduction heat transfer rate within PCM, which is very much required as thermal conductivity of PCM is very low.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the using of finned PCM, PV-temperature reduction values mostly range between 5 and 20 °C, while max. value is about 26.6 °C obtained by Qasim et al (2020) who used RT27 having Tm = 26.6 °C, very close to the ideal PV temperature of 25 °C where PV module performs at its best. Effect of fin insertion inside PCM reduced PV-surface temperature due to the fact that presence of fins increased conduction heat transfer rate within PCM, which is very much required as thermal conductivity of PCM is very low.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…A reduction of 11.3 °C and 22 °C in PV temperature was reported for cases 2 and 3, respectively, along with an enhancement of 4.25% and 6.48% in the electrical performance. Qasim et al (2020) investigated the performance enhancement of PV systems through extensive experiments using two approaches, i.e., incorporating finned PCM with PV with using a different number of fins and using two PCMs having various melting temperatures, disjointed by finned plate. The usage of 2-fin, 5-fin, 8-fin, and 11-fin assisted in lowering the maximum PV temperature by 23.8 °C, 24.2 °C, 25.1 °C, and 26.6 °C, enhancing the electrical efficiency from 10.1 to 11.2%, 11.7%, 11.9%, and 12.1% respectively.…”
Section: Pcm With Finsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current study, using a composite of aluminum foam matrix impregnated with PCM as a passive cooling technique accelerated the melting time of PCM by about 90 min, which was around 37.5% faster than the pure PCM, indicating an effective performance of the current porous foam. In terms of PV-temperature reduction, the proposed cooling technique provides more than a 15 o C drop in the PV temperature, indicating a competitive performance as a passive cooling technique compared to the other studies such as (Kumar et al, 2020;Qasim et al, 2020). Also, in the current study, it was found that the average PV electrical e ciency was enhanced by 14%, which is higher than most of the improvement percentages obtained by the other systems, as indicated in Table 4.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…The global population growth and an ever-increasing need for energy due to the introduction of modern technologies are attracting greater attention (Qasim et al, 2020). Traditional electricity generation technologies, powered by fossil-based energies, are featured by high operating costs, high energy consumption, and destructive environmental effects such as climate change, ozone depletion, and greenhouse warming (Kumar et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qasim investigated the effects of fins number on the performance of a PV-PCM through outdoor experimental tests and compared with a reference PV system. 17 PV cell temperature experienced a maximum reduction of 26.5 C with inserting 11 fins on the backside of a 30 W panel, while it was 22.9 C for without-fin configuration. A similar indoor experiment demonstrated that the electrical efficiency of PV-PCM was improved by 5.16% and 6.59% for PV-PCM and PV-finned PCM, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%