The effect of various dentifrices on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites

Costa, Juliana da; Adams-Belusko, Anne; Riley, K. F.; Ferracane, Jack L.

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2010.02.005

Cited by 113 publications

(160 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

142

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Degradation of composite materials can occur due to mechanical and chemical factors from the oral environment, which can cause changes in surface roughness, 11 loss of surface gloss, and increased discoloration of the material, 12 affecting the esthetic quality of the restoration. These changes have been attributed to the degradation of the polymer matrix, or the resin-filler interface, and loss of inorganic filler particles.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The dentifrice used in this study (Colgate Total, RDA 70) was of low abrasion, 12 being more gentle to the composite surface. It has been found that the major factors influencing abrasion are dentifrice and toothbrush characteristics.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…11,12 In our study, the specimens were immersed in artificial saliva during the experimental period. The leaching pattern has been shown to be consistent for at least one year, and was more evident for composites stored in artificial saliva than for those stored in distilled water.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The influence of mouthrinses and simulated toothbrushing on the surface roughness of a nanofilled composite resin

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of mouthrinses on the surface roughness of a nanofilled composite resin after toothbrushing. One hundred nanofilled composite resin specimens were prepared and randomly distributed into two groups-brushed and non-brushed-and then assigned to five subgroups, according to the mouthrinse solutions (n = 10): Colgate Plax Fresh Mint, Oral B, Cepacol, Colgate Plax, and artificial saliva. Each sample was immersed in 20 mL of the mouthrinses for 1 minute, 5 days per week, twice a day, for a 3-week period. The control group used in the study was one in which the specimens were not subjected to brushing and remained only in artificial saliva. Toothbrushing was performed once a week for 1 minute, for 3 weeks. Surface roughness measurements (Ra) were performed after the immersion period and toothbrushing, by means of a profilometer. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Analysis revealed that the association between toothbrushing and Colgate Plax Fresh Mint produced the lowest surface roughness (p < 0.05). All other groups tested (Oral B, Cepacol, Colgate Plax, artificial saliva) exhibited no statistically significant differences between surfaces, whether subjected to toothbrushing or not (p < 0.05). It was concluded that the surface roughness of the nanofilled composite resin tested can be influenced by the mouthrinse associated with toothbrushing.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The influence of mouthrinses and simulated toothbrushing on the surface roughness of a nanofilled composite resin

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Additionally, polishing generates the aesthetically pleasing glossy appearance like natural enamel. Gloss retention, that is, wear resistance, of dental materials towards abrasive action, such as toothbrushing, depends on their structure and is considered an attribute of longevity and quality of the material, particularly of direct resin composites (Da Costa et al, 2010;Ferracane, 2011;Heintze et al, 2006;Lee et al, 2010). Little is known of whether and how the structural reliability offered by block pre-fabrication manifests itself by the wear performance of the established, newly developed and experimental ceramic-as well as polymer-based aesthetic CAD/CAM block materials.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Toothbrushing influences the wear of enamel and of restorations, mainly by the abrasivity of the toothpaste slurry and by the structure of the restorative materials (Da Costa et al, 2010;Lee et al, 2010;Wiegand et al, 2008). Toothbrushing wear effects are assessed by gloss and roughness measurements (Da Costa et al, 2010;Lee et al, 2010).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Wear characteristics of current aesthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials: Two-body wear, gloss retention, roughness and Martens hardness

Mörmann

Stawarczyk

Ender

et al. 2013

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

294

243

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Stain resistance and surface roughness of CAD/CAM processed hybrid ceramic

Silva

Vivanco

Tonani-Torrieri

et al. 2020

Color Research & Application

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study evaluated the stain resistance and surface roughness alteration of a CAD/CAM processed hybrid ceramic. Specimens were fabricated: 30 of resin‐based composite (RBC; Filtek Z350), 30 of ceramic (IPS emax Press) and 60 of hybrid ceramic (Lava Ultimate). Color, translucency (BYK Gardner), whiteness index for dentistry (WID) and surface roughness (Surftest SJ‐201P) measurements were made. Samples were randomly separated into three groups: Coffee staining (3 hours/day), coffee staining + mechanical toothbrushing (3 hours/day‐staining + 40 cycles‐toothbrushing) and storage in distilled water (control), all for 30 days Afterwards, all specimens were polished: RBC (n = 10) with a composite polishing kit (Enhance Dentsply), ceramic (n = 10) with a ceramic one (Eve Diapol), half of the hybrid ceramic (n = 10) with the composite polishing kit and the other half (n = 10) with the ceramic kit. Then, final readouts were obtained. Data was analyzed by two‐way analysis of variance. The hybrid ceramic exhibited intermediate color change after staining (P < .05). The hybrid ceramic presented WID chance similar to ceramic in control group (P > .05). After staining/brushing, the hybrid ceramic polishing with the ceramic kit revealed the greatest translucency change (P < .05). RBC and hybrid ceramic polishing with the resin kit presented similar surface roughness alteration (P > .05), except after staining/brushing (P < .05). Also, ceramic was different from the hybrid ceramic polishing with the ceramic kit (P < .05). The hybrid ceramic showed intermediate staining and roughness compared to the RBC and the ceramic. The ceramic polishing kit was more effective in removing stains from the hybrid ceramic.

show abstract

The effect of various dentifrices on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites

Cited by 113 publications

References 21 publications

The influence of mouthrinses and simulated toothbrushing on the surface roughness of a nanofilled composite resin

The influence of mouthrinses and simulated toothbrushing on the surface roughness of a nanofilled composite resin

Wear characteristics of current aesthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials: Two-body wear, gloss retention, roughness and Martens hardness

Stain resistance and surface roughness of CAD/CAM processed hybrid ceramic

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About