2016
DOI: 10.1017/s1751731115002736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of varying duration of water restriction on drinking behaviour, welfare and production of lactating sows

Abstract: Access to drinking water is essential for animal welfare, but it is unclear if temporary water restriction during the night represents a welfare problem. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of various durations of nightly restriction of water on thirst in loose housed lactating sows from day 10 to 28 of lactation. A total of 48 sows were deprived of water for either 0 h (n = 12; control), 3 h (n = 12; 0500 to 0800 h), 6 h (n = 12; 0200 to 0800 h) or 12 h (n = 12; 2000 to 0800 h). Control… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, almost 2/3 of the sows were not observed drinking during the first hour after arrival and, furthermore, the number of drinking bouts was considerably low for those that were observed drinking (median 2 events/sow). While the individual water intake was not recorded in the present study, Jensen et al (2016) found loose-housed lactating sows deprived of water for 6 h over-night consume on average 7.5 L water the first three hours after water was re-introduced. In addition, they concluded that with increased water deprivation (0 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h), sows showed signs of increased thirst.…”
Section: Description Of Cull Sow Behaviour In Lairagecontrasting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, almost 2/3 of the sows were not observed drinking during the first hour after arrival and, furthermore, the number of drinking bouts was considerably low for those that were observed drinking (median 2 events/sow). While the individual water intake was not recorded in the present study, Jensen et al (2016) found loose-housed lactating sows deprived of water for 6 h over-night consume on average 7.5 L water the first three hours after water was re-introduced. In addition, they concluded that with increased water deprivation (0 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h), sows showed signs of increased thirst.…”
Section: Description Of Cull Sow Behaviour In Lairagecontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…In addition, they concluded that with increased water deprivation (0 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h), sows showed signs of increased thirst. The majority of the sows in the present study were lactating (63%) and thus may have similar needs for water as found by Jensen et al (2016). Indicators of dehydration like skin elasticity (Thodberg et al, 2019;Thodberg et al, 2023) or physiological measures plasma albumin, protein concentrations or osmolarity (Brown et al, 1999a;Houpt and Yang, 1995) are needed to clarify this.…”
Section: Description Of Cull Sow Behaviour In Lairagementioning
confidence: 76%
“…In a study of lactating sows, kept loose‐housed, Jensen et al. (2016) showed that behavioural signs of thirst increase with increasing duration of water deprivation (from 0 to 12 h of over‐night deprivation. Based on observations of a post‐deprivation reduced latency to drink and an increased compensatory water intake, the authors suggested that these behaviours were associated with a negative subjective experience of thirst.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%